Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31347092›Full record

ReviewDrugs2019

The Evolving Biomarker Landscape for Treatment Selection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Julien Taieb, Andreas Jung, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Marc Peeters, Jenny Seligmann, Aziz Zaanan, Peter Burdon, Clara Montagut, Pierre Laurent-Puig

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Precision oncology: transforming cancer care through personalized medicine.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Julien TaiebSorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France. julien.taieb@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-4753
Andreas JungPathology Institute, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrea Sartore-BianchiNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-0409
Marc PeetersDepartment of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital/Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium.
Jenny SeligmannDivision of Cancer Studies and Pathology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.
Aziz ZaananSorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Peter BurdonEuropean Medical, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7528-025X
Clara MontagutMedical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, CIBERONC, HM Delfos, Barcelona, Spain.
Pierre Laurent-PuigSorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8475-5459
Université Paris Cité · FRAmgen (Switzerland) · CHAntwerp University Hospital · BEDélégation Paris 5 · FRDelfos Hospital · ESGerman Cancer Research Center · DESt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approval of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has led to important improvements in patient outcomes. However, it is still necessary to increase individualisation of treatments based on tumour genetic profiles to optimise efficacy, while minimising toxicity. As such, there is currently great focus on the discovery and validation of further biomarkers in mCRC, with many new potential prognostic and predictive markers being identified alongside developments in patient molecular profiling technologies. Here, we review data for validated and emerging biomarkers impacting treatment strategies in mCRC. We completed a structured literature search of the PubMed database to identify relevant publications, limiting for English-language publications published between 1 January 2014 and 11 July 2018. In addition, we performed a manual search of the key general oncology and CRC-focused congresses to identify abstracts reporting emerging mCRC biomarker data, and of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing clinical trials investigating emerging biomarkers in mCRC and/or molecular-guided clinical trials. There is solid evidence supporting the use of BRAF status as a prognostic biomarker and DYPD, UGT1A1, RAS, and microsatellite instability as predictive biomarkers in mCRC. There are a number of emerging biomarkers that may prove to be clinically relevant in the future to have prognostic (HPP1 methylation), predictive (HER3, microRNAs, anti-angiogenic markers, and CRC intrinsic subtypes), or both prognostic and predictive values (HER2, CpG island methylator phenotype, tumour mutational load, gene fusions, and consensus molecular subtypes). As such, new biomarker-led treatment strategies in addition to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-angiogenetic treatments are being explored. Biomarkers that are not recommended to be tested in clinical practice or are unlikely to be imminently clinically relevant for mCRC include thymidylate transferase, ERCC1, PIK3CA, and PTEN. We highlight the clinical utility of existing and emerging biomarkers in mCRC and provide recommended treatment strategies according to the biomarker status. An update on ongoing molecular-guided clinical trials is also provided.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31347092
PMCPMC6728290
OpenAlexW2964344676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.