Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31347036›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2019

HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Epidemiology, Prescription Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilisation and Costs from a Large Italian Real-World Database.

Carlo Piccinni, Letizia Dondi, Giulia Ronconi, Silvia Calabria, Antonella Pedrini, Immacolata Esposito, Nello Martini, Maurizio Marangolo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. An Analysis of the Social and Economic Costs of Breast Cancer in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlo PiccinniFondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute)-Research and Health Foundation, Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno, 40033, Bologna, Italy.
Letizia DondiFondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute)-Research and Health Foundation, Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno, 40033, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia RonconiFondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute)-Research and Health Foundation, Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno, 40033, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia CalabriaFondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute)-Research and Health Foundation, Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno, 40033, Bologna, Italy.
Antonella PedriniFondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute)-Research and Health Foundation, Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno, 40033, Bologna, Italy.
Immacolata EspositoDrugs and Health, Rome, Italy.
Nello MartiniFondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute)-Research and Health Foundation, Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno, 40033, Bologna, Italy. nello.martini@libero.it.
Maurizio MarangoloFondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute)-Research and Health Foundation, Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno, 40033, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveBreast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The economic burden of breast cancer is crucial for the sustainability of healthcare systems. The objective of this study was to estimate the burden of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Italy, in terms of incidence, prescription patterns, healthcare resource utilisation and costs for the National Health System (NHS).

methodsA cohort study based on healthcare administrative data (ReS database), covering > 10 million Italians, was performed. Incident cases of HR+/HER2- MBC were identified among adult women in 2013. The cohort was followed-up for 2 years to describe healthcare utilisation and integrated costs (pharmaceuticals, hospitalisations and outpatient services) for NHS. Prescription patterns were described as first-line choice and therapeutic changes. Specific therapeutic changes were used as proxies of disease progression. A survival analysis was performed to estimate the time from diagnosis to first disease progression.

resultsOf 5174,723 women, 355 cases of de novo HR+/HER2- MBC were selected (incidence: 6.9 per 100,000). During the 1st follow-up year, they generated an average cost of €7543, whereas €4834 in the 2nd year. The 85.9% received a monotherapy, while the 14.1% received a combination therapy. The most used monotherapy was nonsteroidal-aromatase-inhibitors (45.9%), while the most prescribed combination was tamoxifen + luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues (6.2%). Therapeutic changes occurred in 45.4% of patients, especially from chemotherapy to nonsteroidal-aromatase-inhibitors, after an average of 276.8 days from the first treatment. Disease progression was identified in 22.5% of patients occurring after a mean 13 ± 6 months from diagnosis.

conclusionsThis detailed picture of HR+/HER2- MBC, based on real-world data, could be helpful in health technology assessment and expenditure forecasts of future therapeutic strategies for this condition in Italy.

Indexed as

Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHealth Care CostsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansItalyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAromatase InhibitorsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.