ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2019
A Weighted Genetic Risk Score Based on Four APOE-Independent Alzheimer's Disease Risk Loci May Supplement APOE E4 for Better Disease Prediction.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Genetic Risk Scores for Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia: A Systematic Review.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Polygenic Score Models for Alzheimer's Disease: From Research to Clinical Applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Top Alzheimer's disease risk allele frequencies differ in HABS-HD Mexican- versus Non-Hispanic White Americans.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Alzheimer's disease genetic risk: Top African American risk allele frequencies and genetic architecture among Mexican-, African-, and non-Hispanic White Americans.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in European descent population have identified more than 30 independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the present study, we genotyped 39 AD-risk SNPs in 499 sporadic AD patients and 760 matched healthy controls of Mongolian ethnicity from the Inner Mongolia, China. Further, we investigated whether genetic risk score (GRS) combining multiple AD-risk loci confirmed in our study population could improve AD prediction. Two approaches were used for GRS calculation: a simple risk allele count (cGRS) and a weighted approach (wGRS). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the discriminatory ability of the GRS models. Seven SNPs were confirmed associated with AD and four SNPs were associated with AD risk independent of APOE genotypes in our population. GRS based on either seven SNPs or four APOE-independent SNPs were significantly associated with AD risk (P = 2.3E-17~2.0E-6). The AUC for wGRS was significantly greater than for cGRS (0.6416 versus 0.6339, P = 0.0049 for seven SNPs; 0.5857 versus 0.5765, P = 0.0047 for four APOE-independent SNPs). Furthermore, we found that wGRS combining four APOE-independent SNPs and APOE E4 genotypes reached AUC 0.7023, significantly better than the discriminate ability of APOE E4 genotypes alone (AUC = 0.6699, P = 0.0379). The combined model, with an AUC of 0.6989, significantly higher than that of APOE E4 alone (0.6529) (P = 0.0284), for subjects in a validation cohort comprising 250 cases and 380 controls, randomly selected from our original cohort. In summary, we found that wGRS based on four APOE-independent AD risk SNPs may supplement APOE E4 for better assessing individual risk for AD in Mongolian population in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31346968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.