Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346962›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2020

Predicting human inhibitory control from brain structural MRI.

Ningning He, Edmund T Rolls, Wei Zhao, Shuixia Guo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Utilizing maternal prenatal cognition as a predictor of newborn brain measures of intellectual development.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ningning HeMOE-LCSM, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410006, People's Republic of China.
Edmund T RollsOxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience, Oxford, England.
Wei ZhaoMOE-LCSM, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410006, People's Republic of China.
Shuixia GuoMOE-LCSM, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410006, People's Republic of China. guoshuixia75@163.com.
Hunan Normal University · CNUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.11671129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anatomical structure of the human brain varies widely, as does individual cognitive behavior. It is important and interesting to study the relationship between brain structure and cognitive behavior. There has however been little previous work on the relationship between inhibitory control and brain structure. The goal of this study was to elucidate possible cortical markers related to inhibitory control using structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data. In this study, we analyzed sMRI data and inhibitory control behavior measurement values from 361 healthy adults from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). The data of all participants were divided into two datasets. In the first dataset, we first constructed individual brain morphometric similarity networks by calculating the inter-regional statistical similarity relationship of nine cortical characteristic measures (such as volume) for each brain area obtained from sMRI data. Areas that covary in their morphology are termed 'connected'. After that, we used a brain connectome-based predictive model (CPM) to search for 'connected' brain areas that were significantly related to inhibitory control. This is a purely data-driven method with built-in cross-validation. Two different 'connected' patterns were observed for high and low inhibitory control networks. The high inhibitory control network comprised 25 'connections' (edges between nodes), mostly involving nodes in the prefrontal and especially orbitofrontal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus. In the low inhibitory control network, nodes were scattered between parietal, occipital and limbic areas. Furthermore, these 'connections' were verified as reliable and generalizable in a cross-validation dataset. Two regions of interest, the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex including a part of medial area 10 (R.OFCmed) and left middle temporal gyrus (L.MTG) were crucial nodes in the two networks, respectively, which suggests that these two regions may be fundamentally involved in inhibitory control. Our findings potentially help to understand the relationship between areas with a correlated cortical structure and inhibitory control, and further help to reveal the brain systems related to inhibition and its disorders.

Indexed as

BehaviorBrainConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultHumansInhibition, PsychologicalNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingInhibitory controlLeft middle temporal gyrusMorphometric similarity networksRight medial orbitofrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID31346962
OpenAlexW2964296108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.