Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346911›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

If You Listen, I Will Talk: the Experience of Being Asked About Suicidality During Routine Primary Care.

Julie E Richards, Sarah D Hohl, Ursula Whiteside, Evette J Ludman, David C Grossman, Greg E Simon, Susan M Shortreed, Amy K Lee, Rebecca Parrish, Mary Shea and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Turning to Service Users for the Understanding of Current and Future Mental Health Services in the Development Process of Research and Practice: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julie E RichardsKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. Julie.E.Richards@kp.org.
Sarah D HohlDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ursula WhitesideNowMattersNow.org, Seattle, WA, USA.
Evette J LudmanKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
David C GrossmanKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Greg E SimonKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Susan M ShortreedKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amy K LeeKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rebecca ParrishMental Heath & Wellness, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mary SheaKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ryan M CaldeiroMental Heath & Wellness, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert B PenfoldKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emily C WilliamsKaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine population-based screening for depression is an essential part of evolving health care models integrating care for mental health in primary care. Depression instruments often include questions about suicidal thoughts, but how patients experience these questions in primary care is not known and may have implications for accurate identification of patients at risk.

objectivesTo explore the patient experience of routine population-based depression screening/assessment followed, for some, by suicide risk assessment and discussions with providers.

designQualitative, interview-based study.

participantsThirty-seven patients from Kaiser Permanente Washington who had recently screened positive for depression on the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ] and completed the full PHQ-9. APPROACH: Criterion sampling identified patients who had recently completed the PHQ-9 ninth question which asks about the frequency of thoughts about self-harm. Patients completed semi-structured interviews by phone, which were recorded and transcribed. Directive and conventional content analyses were used to apply knowledge from prior research and elucidate new information from interviews; thematic analysis was used to organize key content overall and across groups based on endorsement of suicide ideation. KEY

resultsFour main organizing themes emerged from analyses: (1) Participants believed being asked about suicidality was contextually appropriate and valuable, (2) some participants described a mismatch between their lived experience and the PHQ-9 ninth question, (3) suicidality disclosures involved weighing hope for help against fears of negative consequences, and (4) provider relationships and acts of listening and caring facilitated discussions about suicidality.

conclusionsAll participants believed being asked questions about suicidal thoughts was appropriate, though some who disclosed suicidal thoughts described experiencing stigma and sometimes distanced themselves from suicidality. Direct communication with trusted providers, who listened and expressed empathy, bolstered comfort with disclosure. Future research should consider strategies for reducing stigma and encouraging fearless disclosure among primary care patients experiencing suicidality.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationAdultAgedDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdepression screeningqualitativesuicidal ideationsuicidalitysuicide assessment

Identifiers

PMID31346911
PMCPMC6816586
OpenAlexW2963888622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.