Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346804›Full record

ReviewPlanta2019

Sheath blight of rice: a review and identification of priorities for future research.

Pooja Singh, Purabi Mazumdar, Jennifer Ann Harikrishna, Subramanian Babu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biological Control of Tomato Root Rot Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Synthesis ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Essential Oil ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Overexpression ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of Nutrient Stress on Plant Disease Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pooja SinghCentre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pooja@um.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-5361
Purabi MazumdarCentre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jennifer Ann HarikrishnaCentre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Subramanian BabuVIT School of Agricultural Innovations and Advanced Learning, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
University of Malaya · MYVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

University of Malaya RU006-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionRice sheath blight research should prioritise optimising biological control approaches, identification of resistance gene mechanisms and application in genetic improvement and smart farming for early disease detection. Rice sheath blight, caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG1-1A, is one of the most devasting diseases of the crop. To move forward with effective crop protection against sheath blight, it is important to review the published information related to pathogenicity and disease management and to determine areas of research that require deeper study. While progress has been made in the identification of pathogenesis-related genes both in rice and in the pathogen, the mechanisms remain unclear. Research related to disease management practices has addressed the use of agronomic practices, chemical control, biological control and genetic improvement: Optimising nitrogen fertiliser use in conjunction with plant spacing can reduce spread of infection while smart agriculture technologies such as crop monitoring with Unmanned Aerial Systems assist in early detection and management of sheath blight disease. Replacing older fungicides with natural fungicides and use of biological agents can provide effective sheath blight control, also minimising environmental impact. Genetic approaches that show promise for the control of sheath blight include treatment with exogenous dsRNA to silence pathogen gene expression, genome editing to develop rice lines with lower susceptibility to sheath blight and development of transgenic rice lines overexpressing or silencing pathogenesis related genes. The main challenges that were identified for effective crop protection against sheath blight are the adaptive flexibility of the pathogen, lack of resistant rice varieties, abscence of single resistance genes for use in breeding and low access of farmers to awareness programmes for optimal management practices.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalGene EditingOryzaPest Control, BiologicalPlant BreedingPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedRhizoctoniaTranscription FactorsPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsBiological controlFungicideGenome editingIntegrated disease managementSmart farmingTranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID31346804
OpenAlexW2963917859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.