ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2019
[Efficacy of biofeedback in patients with chronic low back pain : Impact on pain intensity, psychological factors and stress markers].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of patients with chronic pain should be carried out in interdisciplinary multimodal pain programs of which relaxation methods represent an integral part. The German disease management guidelines (NDGM) on nonspecific low back pain currently do not recommend biofeedback as a relaxation technique for chronic low back pain due to inadequate data. Furthermore, health insurances do not cover the costs of this treatment.
methodsThe efficacy of a 2-week biofeedback treatment was evaluated in a study of 10 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain and 10 healthy, age and gender-matched subjects. The parameters "well-being", "depressive mood" and "pain-related disability" were assessed based on three psychometric tests (KAB, ADS and PDI). The pain intensity was measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and biofeedback measurement parameters themselves as well as stress markers in blood (noradrenaline, cortisol and MMP-2) were also measured.
resultsThe relaxation response was demonstrated by the biofeedback-parameters. The treatment led to an improvement in well-being, depressive mood and pain-related disability. These results correlated with a reduction of noradrenaline and MMP-2 blood levels, whereas cortisol concentrations showed no change.
conclusionBiofeedback relaxation is a suitable method in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. Its use in interdisciplinary multimodal pain programs should be encouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.