Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346755›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Prognostic and theranostic 18F-FDG PET biomarkers for anti-PD1 immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: association with outcome and transcriptomics.

Romain-David Seban, John S Nemer, Aurélien Marabelle, Randy Yeh, Eric Deutsch, Samy Ammari, Antoine Moya-Plana, Fatima-Zohra Mokrane, Robyn D Gartrell, Grace Finkel and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Comparison of [European radiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Multicenter evaluation of commercial AI for [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic value of TMTV and Dmax calculated fromEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Imaging Immunotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. The Prognostic Value of Biomarkers Identified by [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Organ Crosstalk: The Role of Spleen.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Romain-David SebanDépartement d'imagerie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94800, Villejuif, France.
John S NemerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Aurélien MarabelleDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Randy YehDepartment of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10039, USA.
Eric DeutschDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Samy AmmariDépartement d'imagerie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Antoine Moya-PlanaInserm U981, Melanoma group, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Fatima-Zohra MokraneDepartment of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10039, USA.
Robyn D GartrellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Grace FinkelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Luke BarkerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Amélie E BigorgneDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10039, USA.
Yvonne SaengerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Caroline RobertInserm U981, Melanoma group, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Laurent DercleDepartment of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10039, USA. ld2752@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1322-0710

Funding

A prognostic mRNA immune signature for resected stage II-III melanomaUH2CA218149 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KROLEWSKI, JOHN J., SAENGER, YVONNE MARGARET · 2019 to 2020
$365k
NCI NIH HHS UH2 CA218149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn imaging-based stratification tool is needed to identify melanoma patients who will benefit from anti Programmed Death-1 antibody (anti-PD1). We aimed at identifying biomarkers for survival and response evaluated in lymphoid tissue metabolism in spleen and bone marrow before initiation of therapy.

methodsThis retrospective study included 55 patients from two institutions who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before anti-PD1. Parameters extracted were SUVmax, SUVmean, HISUV (SUV-based Heterogeneity Index), TMTV (total metabolic tumor volume), TLG (total lesion glycolysis), BLR (Bone marrow-to-Liver SUVmax ratio), and SLR (Spleen-to-Liver SUVmax ratio). Each parameter was dichotomized using the median as a threshold. Association with survival, best overall response (BOR), and transcriptomic analyses (NanoString assay) were evaluated using Cox prediction models, Wilcoxon tests, and Spearman's correlation, respectively.

resultsAt 20.7 months median follow-up, 33 patients had responded, and 29 patients died. Median PFS and OS were 11.4 (95%CI 2.7-20.2) and 28.5 (95%CI 13.4-43.8) months. TMTV (>25cm

conclusionLow tumor burden correlates with survival and objective response while hematopoietic tissue metabolism correlates inversely with survival. These biomarkers should be further evaluated for potential clinical application.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Follow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18PDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorFDG-PET/CTImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMetabolic tumor burdenMetastatic melanomaPrognosisSystemic inflammatory response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.