Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346683›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2019

A deletion in the STA1 promoter determines maltotriose and starch utilization in STA1+ Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Kristoffer Krogerus, Frederico Magalhães, Joosu Kuivanen, Brian Gibson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Core gene set of the speciesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Comparative adaptability of 307Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. European farmhouse brewing yeasts form a distinct genetic group.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beer fermentation performance and sugar uptake ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unique Brewing-Relevant Properties of a Strain ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Lager Yeast Design Through Meiotic Segregation of aFrontiers in fungal biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristoffer KrogerusVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland. kristoffer.krogerus@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-8277
Frederico MagalhãesVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland.
Joosu KuivanenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland.
Brian GibsonVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland.
Tieto (Finland) · FITampere University · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 276480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diastatic strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are common contaminants in beer fermentations and are capable of producing an extracellular STA1-encoded glucoamylase. Recent studies have revealed variable diastatic ability in strains tested positive for STA1, and here, we elucidate genetic determinants behind this variation. We show that poorly diastatic strains have a 1162-bp deletion in the promoter of STA1. With CRISPR/Cas9-aided reverse engineering, we show that this deletion greatly decreases the ability to grow in beer and consume dextrin, and the expression of STA1. New PCR primers were designed for differentiation of highly and poorly diastatic strains based on the presence of the deletion in the STA1 promoter. In addition, using publically available whole genome sequence data, we show that the STA1 gene is prevalent among the 'Beer 2'/'Mosaic Beer' brewing strains. These strains utilize maltotriose efficiently, but the mechanisms for this have been unknown. By deleting STA1 from a number of highly diastatic strains, we show here that extracellular hydrolysis of maltotriose through STA1 appears to be the dominant mechanism enabling maltotriose use during wort fermentation in STA1+ strains. The formation and retention of STA1 seems to be an alternative evolutionary strategy for efficient utilization of sugars present in brewer's wort. The results of this study allow for the improved reliability of molecular detection methods for diastatic contaminants in beer and can be exploited for strain development where maltotriose use is desired.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticBeerCRISPR-Cas SystemsDextrinsFermentationFungal ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsReverse GeneticsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence DeletionStarchTrisaccharidesDextrinsFungal ProteinsmaltotrioseSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsStarchTrisaccharidesBeerDextrinDiastaticGenomeStarchYeast

Identifiers

PMID31346683
PMCPMC6719335
OpenAlexW2965867507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.