Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346674›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019

Prospective evaluation of CT-guided HDR brachytherapy as a local ablative treatment for renal masses: a single-arm pilot trial.

R Damm, T Streitparth, P Hass, M Seidensticker, C Heinze, M Powerski, J J Wendler, U B Liehr, K Mohnike, M Pech and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Protocol-based CT-guided brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer and previous rectal extirpation-a curative approach.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R DammDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. robert.damm@med.ovgu.de.
T StreitparthDepartment of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
P HassDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
M SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
C HeinzeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
M PowerskiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
J J WendlerDepartment of Urology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
U B LiehrDepartment of Urology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
K MohnikeDiagnostic and Therapeutic Center am Frankfurter Tor, Berlin, Germany.
M PechDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
J RickeDepartment of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEDiagnostic and Treatment Centre Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this pilot trial, we investigate the safety of CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a local ablative treatment for renal masses not eligible for resection or nephrectomy.

methodsWe investigated renal function after irradiation by HDR-BT in 16 patients (11 male, 5 female, mean age 76 years) with 20 renal lesions (renal cell carcinoma n = 18; renal metastases n = 2). Two patients had previous contralateral nephrectomy and two had ipsilateral partial nephrectomy. Six lesions had a hilar localization with proximity to the renal pelvis and would have not been favorable for thermal ablation. Renal function loss was determined within 1 year after HDR-BT by renal scintigraphy and laboratory parameters. Further investigations included CT and MRI every 3 months to observe procedural safety and local tumor control. Renal function tests were analyzed by Wilcoxon's signed rank test with Bonferroni-Holm correction of p-values. Survival and local tumor control underwent a Kaplan-Meier estimation.

resultsMedian follow-up was 22.5 months. One patient required permanent hemodialysis 32 months after repeated HDR-BT and contralateral radiofrequency ablation of multifocal renal cell carcinoma. No other patient developed a significant worsening in global renal function and no gastrointestinal or urogenital side effects were observed. Only one patient died of renal tumor progression. Local control rate was 95% including repeated HDR-BT of two recurrences.

conclusionHDR-BT is a feasible and safe technique for the local ablation of renal masses. A phase II study is recruiting to evaluate the efficacy of this novel local ablative treatment in a larger study population.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidneyKidney Function TestsKidney NeoplasmsMalePatient SafetyPilot ProjectsBrachytherapyLocal-ablative treatmentRenal cell cancerRenal functionRenal tumors

Identifiers

PMID31346674
OpenAlexW2962948475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.