Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346668›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Magnetic resonance arthrography is insufficiently accurate to diagnose biceps lesions prior to rotator cuff repair.

Elise Loock, Aude Michelet, Amaury D'Utruy, Pierre Molinazzi, Gerjon Hannink, Simon Bertiaux, Olivier Courage

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Magnetic resonance arthrography is insufficiently accurate to diagnose biceps lesions prior to rotator cuff repair.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Elise LoockService de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHRU de Lille, avenue du professeur Emile Laine, Lille, France.
Aude MicheletReSurg SA, Chemin de Vuarpilliere 35, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland. journals@resurg.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6291-6143
Amaury D'UtruyHopital Privé de Versailles, Clinique des Franciscaines, Versailles, France.
Pierre MolinazziRamsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé de l'Estuaire, Le Havre, France.
Gerjon HanninkOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Simon BertiauxRamsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé de l'Estuaire, Le Havre, France.
Olivier CourageRamsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé de l'Estuaire, Le Havre, France.
Générale de Santé · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRFederal Roads Office · CHRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy between magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and arthroscopic examination for the assessment of pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) prior to rotator cuff (RC) repair. The hypothesis was that MRA is suitable to identify biceps instabilities, due to improved visibility of the biceps pulley.

methodsSixty-six patients aged 58.5 ± 17.6 (range, 46-71) scheduled to have RC repair between 2016 and 2017 were prospectively enrolled. MRA images of the LHB were interpreted by one radiologist and two surgeons, then compared to arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing MRA axial readings to arthroscopic assessment in the neutral position (static instability), MRA sagittal readings to arthroscopic assessment in external rotation (dynamic s instability), MRA coronal and axial readings to arthroscopic assessment in the neutral position (tendinopathy).

resultsAmong the three observers, the radiologist obtained the highest sensitivity and specificity for MRA, which were respectively: (1) for static instability, 62% (C.I. 35-85) and 77% (C.I. 63-88); (2) for dynamic instability, 50% (C.I. 29-71) and 62% (C.I. 46-77), and (3) for tendinopathy, 49% (C.I. 36-62) and 100% (C.I. 3-100).

conclusionsMRA is not suitable for the diagnosis of LHB lesions prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedArthroscopyFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareProspective StudiesRotator Cuff InjuriesSensitivity and SpecificityShoulder JointTendinopathyTendon InjuriesArthroscopic rotator cuff repairDiagnostic accuracyLesion of the long head of the bicepsMagnetic resonance arthrography

Identifiers

PMID31346668
OpenAlexW2962838832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.