Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346664›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2019

Postnatal Cardiac Development and Regenerative Potential in Large Mammals.

Nivedhitha Velayutham, Emma J Agnew, Katherine E Yutzey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Electroanatomical adaptations in the guinea pig heart from neonatal to adulthood.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiomyocyte-fibroblast crosstalk in the postnatal heart.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Porcine Models of Heart Regeneration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  17. Manipulating Cardiomyocyte Plasticity for Heart Regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Communal living: the role of polyploidy and syncytia in tissue biology.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Nucleated red blood cells participate in myocardial regeneration in the toadExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nivedhitha VelayuthamDivision of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, ML7020, 240 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Emma J AgnewDivision of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, ML7020, 240 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Katherine E YutzeyDivision of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, ML7020, 240 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. Katherine.Yutzey@cchmc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1444-7124
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Cardiac Fibroblasts in Postnatal Development and Adult Injury ResponseR01HL142217 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Jeffery D Molkentin, Katherine E Yutzey · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
Regulatory mechanisms of adult cardiomyocyte proliferationR01HL135848 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI YUTZEY, KATHERINE E · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135848NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142217NIH HHS R01 HL135848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neonatal capacity for cardiac regeneration in mice is well studied and has been used to develop many potential strategies for adult cardiac regenerative repair following injury. However, translating these findings from rodents to designing regenerative therapeutics for adult human heart disease remains elusive. Large mammals including pigs, dogs, and sheep are widely used as animal models of humans in preclinical trials of new cardiac drugs and devices. However, very little is known about the fundamental cardiac cell biology and the timing of postnatal cardiac events that influence cardiomyocyte proliferation in these animals. There is emerging evidence that external physiological and environmental cues could be the key to understanding cardiomyocyte proliferative behavior. In this review, we survey available literature on postnatal development in various large mammal models to offer a perspective on the physiological and cellular characteristics that could be regulating cardiomyocyte proliferation. Similarities and differences between developmental milestones, cardiomyocyte maturational events, as well as environmental cues regulating cardiac development, are discussed for various large mammals, with a focus on postnatal cardiac regenerative potential and translatability to the human heart.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalDogsHeartHumansMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationSheepSwineCardiac regenerationCardiomyocyte proliferationHuman heart diseaseLarge mammalsPostnatal heart development

Identifiers

PMID31346664
PMCPMC6786953
OpenAlexW2963493357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.