Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346646›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2019

Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Four Commonly Used Methods for Identification of Novel Plasma Membrane Proteins.

Kubra Karaosmanoglu Yoneten, Murat Kasap, Gurler Akpinar, Aylin Kanli, Erdal Karaoz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kubra Karaosmanoglu YonetenBiomedical Engineering Department, Technology Faculty, Kocaeli University, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Murat KasapDepartment of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey. mkasap@kocaeli.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-8527-2096
Gurler AkpinarDepartment of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Aylin KanliDepartment of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Erdal KaraozDepartment of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, Istinye University, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

TUBITAK 113S868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma membrane proteins perform a variety of important tasks in the cells. These tasks can be diverse as carrying nutrients across the plasma membrane, receiving chemical signals from outside the cell, translating them into intracellular action, and anchoring the cell in a particular location. When these crucial roles of plasma membrane proteins are considered, the need for their characterization becomes inevitable. Certain characteristics of plasma membrane proteins such as hydrophobicity, low solubility, and low abundance limit their detection by proteomic analyses. Here, we presented a comparative proteomics study in which the most commonly used plasma membrane protein enrichment methods were evaluated. The methods that were utilized include biotinylation, selective CyDye labeling, temperature-dependent phase partition, and density-gradient ultracentrifugation. Western blot analysis was performed to assess the level of plasma membrane protein enrichment using plasma membrane and cytoplasmic protein markers. Quantitative evaluation of the level of enrichment was performed by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and benzyldimethyl-n-hexadecylammonium chloride/sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (16-BAC/SDS-PAGE) from which the protein spots were cut and identified. Results from this study demonstrated that density-gradient ultracentrifugation method was superior when coupled with 16-BAC/SDS-PAGE. This work presents a valuable contribution and provides a future direction to the membrane sub-proteome research by evaluating commonly used methods for plasma membrane protein enrichment.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneCHO CellsCricetulusElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMembrane ProteinsProteomicsUltracentrifugationMembrane Proteins16-BAC/SDS-PAGE2-DEMembrane protein enrichmentPlasma membrane proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.