Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346613›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2019

Molecular profiling of long-term IDH-wildtype glioblastoma survivors.

Danielle M Burgenske, Jie Yang, Paul A Decker, Thomas M Kollmeyer, Matthew L Kosel, Ann C Mladek, Alissa A Caron, Rachael A Vaubel, Shiv K Gupta, Gaspar J Kitange and 16 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gene Expression Patterns Associated with Survival in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Combination of pre-treatment dynamic [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. A Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Danielle M BurgenskeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jie YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Paul A DeckerDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Thomas M KollmeyerLaboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Matthew L KoselDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ann C MladekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alissa A CaronLaboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rachael A VaubelLaboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shiv K GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Gaspar J KitangeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hugues SicotteDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ryan S YoulandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Dioval RemondeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Jesse S VossMolecular Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Emily G Barr FritcherMolecular Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kathryn L KolskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Cristiane M IdaLaboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Fredric B MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Daniel H LachanceDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ian J ParneyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Benjamin R KippMolecular Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Caterina GianniniAnatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Erik P SulmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Robert B JenkinsLaboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jeanette E Eckel-PassowDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

(PQD3) Mechanisms of prolonged initial disease-free survival in glioblastomaR01CA184320 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SARKARIA, JANN N. · 2014 to 2017
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) represents an aggressive cancer type with a median survival of only 14 months. With fewer than 5% of patients surviving 5 years, comprehensive profiling of these rare patients could elucidate prognostic biomarkers that may confer better patient outcomes. We utilized multiple molecular approaches to characterize the largest patient cohort of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBM long-term survivors (LTS) to date.

methodsRetrospective analysis was performed on 49 archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor specimens from patients diagnosed with GBM at the Mayo Clinic between December 1995 and September 2013. These patient samples were subdivided into 2 groups based on survival (12 LTS, 37 short-term survivors [STS]) and subsequently examined by mutation sequencing, copy number analysis, methylation profiling, and gene expression.

resultsOf the 49 patients analyzed in this study, LTS were younger at diagnosis (P = 0.016), more likely to be female (P = 0.048), and MGMT promoter methylated (UniD, P = 0.01). IDH-wildtype STS and LTS demonstrated classic GBM mutations and copy number changes. Pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes showed LTS enrichment for sphingomyelin metabolism, which has been linked to decreased GBM growth, invasion, and angiogenesis. STS were enriched for DNA repair and cell cycle control networks.

conclusionsWhile our findings largely report remarkable similarity between these LTS and more typical STS, unique attributes were observed in regard to altered gene expression and pathway enrichment. These attributes may be valuable prognostic markers and are worth further examination. Importantly, this study also underscores the limitations of existing biomarkers and classification methods in predicting patient prognosis.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenasecopy number alterationsglioblastomamethylationmutation analysisRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31346613
PMCPMC6827834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.