Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346540›Full record

ArticleJournal of arthropod-borne diseases2019

A Comparative Pathomorphological Findings Between

Ozcan Ozkan, Mehmet Eray Alcigir

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arthropod-borne diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ozcan OzkanÇankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey.
Mehmet Eray AlcigirDepartment of Pathology, Kirikkale University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Çankırı Karatekin University · TRKırıkkale University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of study was to compare macroscopical and histopathological findings between venoms belonging to two scorpion species,

methodsThe animals used in this experimental study were fifteen New Zealand bred rabbits. Three groups were constituted as group I (

resultsThe pathomorphological findings from group I were found to be more severe than those observed in group II. The venom from the newly identified

conclusionThese findings will provide a better understanding of envenomation of human beings in terms of the possible consequences of scorpion toxication on the organs.

Indexed as

Androctonus crassicaudaLeirus abdullahbayramiPathomorphologyRabbitVenom

Identifiers

PMID31346540
PMCPMC6643014
OpenAlexW2945845657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.