ArticleApplications in plant sciences2019
Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for
Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis of a geographic provenance of Glyptostrobus pensilis.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Genetic Variation for Wild Populations of the Rare and Endangered PlantCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Chloroplast genomes of fourFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers Based on the Chloroplast Genome of Tree Peony.Genes · 2022Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences of 14Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Comparison and Phylogenetic Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes of Three Medicinal and EdibleInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers forApplications in plant sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premiseMETHODS AND
resultsUsing a complete chloroplast genome sequence, we designed 70 cpSSR loci and tested them for amplification success and polymorphism in 16 samples. Ten loci were found to be polymorphic and their genetic diversity was characterized using a total of 83 individuals from three populations in China. A total of 43 haplotypes were present, the effective number of haplotypes varied from 4.55 to 13.36, and the haplotypic richness ranged from 8.04 to 16.00. Gene diversity ranged from 0.81 to 0.97 (average 0.89). The number of alleles per locus and population ranged from one to eight, and the effective number of alleles ranged from 1.00 to 3.90. All polymorphic loci were successfully amplified in the related species
conclusionsThese newly developed chloroplast microsatellites will be useful for population genetic and phylogeographic analyses of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.