Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346409›Full record

Trial reportChiropractic & manual therapies2019

Guideline implementation in the Canadian chiropractic setting: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial and parallel study.

Prakash Dhopte, Simon D French, Jeffrey A Quon, Heather Owens, André Bussières, Canadian Chiropractic Guideline Initiative

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02483091 (Chiropractors Can Do), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02483091 phase1completednot on this map

Chiropractors Can Do: Testing the Feasibility of Intervening to Optimize Chiropractic Care for Adults With Neck Pain Disorders: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill UniversityRan2015 to 2016Enrolled32ConditionsNeck PainArmsMultifaceted KT intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Prakash Dhopte1School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Hosmer House, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y5 Canada.
Simon D French3Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, 24/1 Lakeside Rd, Eastwood NSW, 2122 Australia.
Jeffrey A Quon4School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada.
Heather Owens8CISSS Laval-Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, CRIR-Feil Oberfeld Research Centre, 3205 Place Alton Goldbloom, Laval, Qc H7V 1R2 Canada.
André Bussières1School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Hosmer House, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y5 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-6949
Canadian Chiropractic Guideline Initiative
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAJewish Rehabilitation Hospital · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Feasibility and pilot studies are recommended prior to embarking on large-scale costly confirmatory trials. The objectives were to determine the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial (C-RCT) to evaluate a complex knowledge translation (KT) intervention to improve the management of people with neck pain, and to identify challenges and potential solutions to conducting a fully powered C-RCT in the chiropractic setting. Methods: Pilot C-RCT involving a nationally representative sample of chiropractors and patients. We invited 400 chiropractors and 150 patients to participate. Clinicians were randomized to receive either an online theory-based KT educational and brief action plan (BAP) intervention (intervention group) or a copy of a clinical practice guideline (control group). Study-related challenges were ascertained via mid-study phone interviews and end-of-study feedback questionnaires. Analyses focused on descriptive estimates of likely recruitment, retention, and adherence rates, and documentation of potential barriers. Results: In total, 47 chiropractors (12%) agreed to participate and were randomized after resampling. Fifteen withdrew from the study, leaving a total of 32 (8%) participants. Eleven chiropractors in the intervention group completed the webinars and e-learning modules, two partially completed them and three did not register. Participating chiropractors recruited a total of 29 patients. Sixty-three percent ( Conclusion: Recruitment of clinicians and patients for a trial of a complex intervention can be challenging, and retention of participants after enrolment may be low. Future trials of this nature likely require multiple recruitment strategies to achieve desired sample sizes. Moreover, time-constraint issues are perceived particularly by clinicians as a major barrier to both study enrolment before, and protocol adherence during, their actual participation in a trial. Trial registration: The study was registered at, NCT02483091, on 17th June 2015.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCanadaChiropracticFemaleGuidelines as TopicHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsResearch DesignYoung AdultAdherenceChiropracticFeasibility studiesInterviewsKnowledge translationMultifaceted interventionPilot projectsRandomized controlled trialRecruitmentRetention

Identifiers

PMID31346409
PMCPMC6636122
OpenAlexW2961273870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.