ArticleJournal of medical ethics and history of medicine2018
Learning professionalism through hidden curriculum: Iranian medical students' perspective.
Article in Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mental health and professional identity formation amongst medical students in Singapore: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Effects of the Hidden Curriculum in Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Student Perspectives on Professionalism: Time to Reform Curriculum for Better Patient Experience.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Role modelling in professional identity formation: a systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- A Scoping Review of Professional Identity Formation in Undergraduate Medical Education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- What is hidden in hidden curriculum? a qualitative study in medicine.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning professionalism is a central topic in medical education. While many factors could affect the educational process of professionalism, hidden curriculum is considered one of the most important ones. As the working components of a hidden curriculum might be specific to the settings, this study explored its components in terms of professionalism and ethical conduct from the viewpoint of Iranian undergraduate medical trainees. Semi-structured and in-depth interviews were used to collect medical students' experiences and viewpoints, which were then analyzed through simple content analysis and the codes and categories were extracted. Finally, themes were derived as the central organizing concepts. Saturation occurred after 17 interviews. Seven main themes were extracted as the working components of hidden curriculum regarding professionalism in the setting: 'convenient patients', 'evaluate me', 'trust as the base of team interactions', 'perceiving encouragement', 'relationship satisfaction and authenticity', 'workload and students' well-being' and 'role modeling at the heart of professionalism'. Students' perception and experiences are a rich source of gaining a deeper understanding of the working hidden curriculum. In this study, two groups of human-related and environment-related elements were extracted. They were effective in the formation of the current 'ethical climate', which shaped the professional and ethical identity of medical trainees. Moreover, specific plans regarding the condition of the settings may provide opportunities for medical educators to enhance professionalism in their institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31346387PMC6642446W2898569778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.