ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2019
ESTIMATING POPULATION AVERAGE CAUSAL EFFECTS IN THE PRESENCE OF NON-OVERLAP: THE EFFECT OF NATURAL GAS COMPRESSOR STATION EXPOSURE ON CANCER MORTALITY.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating treatment effects from non-overlapping cohorts with application to antimicrobial resistance.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Synthesis estimators for transportability with positivity violations by a continuous covariate.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2025Article
- Article
- It's electric! An environmental equity perspective on the lifecycle of our energy sources.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
- Personalized statin treatment plan using counterfactual approach with multi-objective optimization over benefits and risks.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2023Article
- The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Annals of global health · 2023Review
- Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: Violations of the positivity assumption in the causal analysis of observational data: Consequences and statistical approaches.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2021Review
- Borrowing from supplemental sources to estimate causal effects from a primary data source.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- A practical introduction to Bayesian estimation of causal effects: Parametric and nonparametric approaches.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- In Pursuit of Evidence in Air Pollution Epidemiology: The Role of Causally Driven Data Science.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Most causal inference studies rely on the assumption of overlap to estimate population or sample average causal effects. When data suffer from non-overlap, estimation of these estimands requires reliance on model specifications, due to poor data support. All existing methods to address non-overlap, such as trimming or down-weighting data in regions of poor data support, change the estimand so that inference cannot be made on the sample or the underlying population. In environmental health research settings, where study results are often intended to influence policy, population-level inference may be critical, and changes in the estimand can diminish the impact of the study results, because estimates may not be representative of effects in the population of interest to policymakers. Researchers may be willing to make additional, minimal modeling assumptions in order to preserve the ability to estimate population average causal effects. We seek to make two contributions on this topic. First, we propose a flexible, data-driven definition of propensity score overlap and non-overlap regions. Second, we develop a novel Bayesian framework to estimate population average causal effects with minor model dependence and appropriately large uncertainties in the presence of non-overlap and causal effect heterogeneity. In this approach, the tasks of estimating causal effects in the overlap and non-overlap regions are delegated to two distinct models, suited to the degree of data support in each region. Tree ensembles are used to non-parametrically estimate individual causal effects in the overlap region, where the data can speak for themselves. In the non-overlap region, where insufficient data support means reliance on model specification is necessary, individual causal effects are estimated by extrapolating trends from the overlap region via a spline model. The promising performance of our method is demonstrated in simulations. Finally, we utilize our method to perform a novel investigation of the causal effect of natural gas compressor station exposure on cancer outcomes. Code and data to implement the method and reproduce all simulations and analyses is available on Github (https://github.com/rachelnethery/overlap).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.