Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346339›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

Real-World Evidence from the Integrative Medicine Primary Care Trial (IMPACT): Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes at Baseline and 12-Month Follow-Up.

Robert L Crocker, Jason T Hurwitz, Amy J Grizzle, Ivo Abraham, Rick Rehfeld, Randy Horwitz, Andrew T Weil, Victoria Maizes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Case for Whole-Person Integrative Care.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert L CrockerAndrew Weil Center for Integrative Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-6394
Jason T HurwitzCenter for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research (HOPE), College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3879-9877
Amy J GrizzleCenter for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research (HOPE), College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4485-1459
Ivo AbrahamCenter for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research (HOPE), College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0490-4421
Rick RehfeldCenter for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research (HOPE), College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Randy HorwitzAndrew Weil Center for Integrative Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9527-8926
Andrew T WeilAndrew Weil Center for Integrative Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Victoria MaizesAndrew Weil Center for Integrative Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe University of Arizona Integrative Health Center (UAIHC) was an innovative membership-supported integrative medicine (IM) adult primary care clinic in Phoenix, Arizona. UAIHC delivered healthcare using an integrative medicine model that combined conventional and complementary medical treatments, including nutrition, mind-body medicine, acupuncture, manual medicine, health coaching, educational classes, and groups. Results from pre-post evaluation of patient-reported outcomes on several standardized measures are presented here.

methodsUAIHC patients completed surveys at baseline and after 12 months of continuous integrative primary care. Patients reported on perceived changes in health outcomes as measured by

results177 patients completed baseline and follow-up outcome measures. Patients were predominantly white, female, college-educated, and employed. Baseline to one-year follow-up results indicate statistically significant improvements (

conclusionsFollowing one year of IM primary care at UAIHC, patient-reported outcomes indicated positive impacts in several areas of patients' lives: mental, physical, and overall health; work productivity; sleep quality; pain; fatigue; overall well-being; and physical activity.

Identifiers

PMID31346339
PMCPMC6617880
OpenAlexW2954203564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.