Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346282›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2018

Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force.

Ashley J Thomas, Lotte Thomsen, Angela F Lukowski, Meline Abramyan, Barbara W Sarnecka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychological foundations of human status allocation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Infants expect leaders to right wrongs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashley J ThomasDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. ashleyjt@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1239-883X
Lotte ThomsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Angela F LukowskiDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Meline AbramyanDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Barbara W SarneckaDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

How infants use the affiliations of their caregivers to evaluate others.F32HD096829 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI THOMAS, ASHLEY J · 2018 to 2021
$189k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD096829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social hierarchies occur across human societies, so all humans must navigate them. Infants can detect when one individual outranks another

Indexed as

Competitive BehaviorPsychology, ChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHierarchy, SocialHumansInfantMalePlay and PlaythingsViolence

Identifiers

PMID31346282
PMCPMC7654717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.