Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346241›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Relationship between device acceptance and patient-reported outcomes in Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) recipients.

Crispino Tosto, Luigi Adamo, Heidi Craddock, Maria Di Blasi, Rosario Girgenti, Francesco Clemenza, Robert M Carney, Gregory Ewald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Improving Quality of Life in Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiovascular Trials.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Crispino TostoFrom the University of Palermo, Department of Psychological and Educational Sciences, Palermo, Italy.
Luigi AdamoFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. ladamo@wustl.edu.
Heidi CraddockFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Maria Di BlasiFrom the University of Palermo, Department of Psychological and Educational Sciences, Palermo, Italy.
Rosario GirgentiFrom the Heart Failure Unit, ISMETT, Palermo, Italy.
Francesco ClemenzaFrom the Heart Failure Unit, ISMETT, Palermo, Italy.
Robert M CarneyFrom the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Gregory EwaldFrom the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

PRINCIPLES IN CARDIVASCULAR RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007081 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Abhinav Diwan, Karen Ellen Joynt Maddox · 1985 to 2026
$10.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) implanted each year is rising. Nevertheless, there are minimal data on device acceptance after LVAD implant, and on its relationship with patient-reported outcomes. We designed a cross-sectional study to address this knowledge gap and test the hypothesis that low device acceptance is associated with poorer quality of life, depression and anxiety. Self-report questionnaires were administered to assess quality of life (12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire quality of life subscale), level of anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder; GAD-7), level of depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ-9) and device acceptance (Florida Patient Acceptance Survey; FPAS) to 101 consecutive patients presenting to LVAD clinic. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation between device acceptance and both psychological distress (p < 0.001) and quality of life (p < 0.001). Analysis of the sub-scales of the FPAS showed that patients had significant body image concerns, but return to function and device-related distress were the main drivers of the observed correlation between device acceptance and patient well-being. Younger age was associated with lower device acceptance (r = 0.36, p < 0.001) and lower quality of life (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that interventions targeting device acceptance should be explored to improve outcomes in LVAD recipients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyDepressionFemaleHeart-Assist DevicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID31346241
PMCPMC6658659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.