Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31346153›Full record

ArticleAnnals of transplantation2019

The Role of Pre-Procurement Pancreas Suitability Score (P-PASS) and Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI) in the Outcome of Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney or Pancreas After Kidney Transplantation.

Clemens Franz, Magdalena Görtz, Michael Wührl, Yakup Kulu, Katrin Hoffmann, Thilo Hackert, Christian Morath, Martin Zeier, Markus W Büchler, Arianeb Mehrabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Utilization of the Pancreas From Donors With an Extremely High Pancreas Donor Risk Index: Report of the National Registry of Pancreas Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Clemens FranzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Magdalena GörtzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael WührlDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Yakup KuluDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin HoffmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian MorathDepartment of Nephrology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin ZeierDepartment of Nephrology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arianeb MehrabiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The pre-procurement pancreas suitability score (P-PASS) and the pancreas donor risk index (pDRI) are established predictive scores for graft survival and patient outcome following pancreatic transplantation. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of P-PASS and pDRI following simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation, or pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation, and the clinical impact of donor-specific factors on the postoperative graft and recipient outcome at a single transplant center. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 105 patients who underwent SPK (n=104) or PAK (n=4) between 2000 and 2017. Donor-specific and recipient-specific parameters were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the outcome after transplantation. RESULTS Overall, the mean 1-year and 5-year pancreas graft survival and patient survival rates were 78.7% and 93.2%, and 76.9% and 90.0%, respectively. The postoperative outcome in patients with a P-PASS score of <17 was not significantly different when compared with patients with a score of ≥17. A P-PASS score of ≥17 was significantly associated with early pancreas graft loss (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in postoperative outcome between patients with high pDRI and low pDRI. Smoking of donor (p=0.046) was a risk factor and coronary heart disease of recipient (p=0.003) had a significant effect on survival of pancreas graft. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that P-PASS and pDRI were not reliable predictors of outcome after pancreas transplantation and that specific characteristics of the donor and recipient must be evaluated when predicting the outcome of pancreas transplantation.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalAdultFemaleHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPancreas TransplantationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID31346153
PMCPMC6681688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.