Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345953›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2019

Enhanced Maps of Transcription Factor Binding Sites Improve Regulatory Networks Learned from Accessible Chromatin Data.

Shubhada R Kulkarni, D Marc Jones, Klaas Vandepoele

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. RhizogenicProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shubhada R KulkarniGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2290-8004
D Marc JonesGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3167-2590
Klaas VandepoeleGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, 9052 Ghent, Belgium klaas.vandepoele@psb.vib-ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-4790-2725
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining where transcription factors (TFs) bind in genomes provides insight into which transcriptional programs are active across organs, tissue types, and environmental conditions. Recent advances in high-throughput profiling of regulatory DNA have yielded large amounts of information about chromatin accessibility. Interpreting the functional significance of these data sets requires knowledge of which regulators are likely to bind these regions. This can be achieved by using information about TF-binding preferences, or motifs, to identify TF-binding events that are likely to be functional. Although different approaches exist to map motifs to DNA sequences, a systematic evaluation of these tools in plants is missing. Here, we compare four motif-mapping tools widely used in the Arabidopsis (

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksArabidopsisChromatinMeristemProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MappingTranscription FactorsChromatinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31345953
PMCPMC6776849
OpenAlexW2964527004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.