Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345943›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging.

M T Duong, J D Rudie, J Wang, L Xie, S Mohan, J C Gee, A M Rauschecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. 3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M T DuongFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0312-5530
J D RudieFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-8609-8421
J WangFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-3455-7750
L XieFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-7184-7028
S MohanFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4025-115X
J C GeeFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2258-0187
A M RauscheckerFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. andreas.rauschecker@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0633-9876

Funding

Biomedical Imaging for Clinician ScientistsT32EB001631 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOMAS M LINK · 2005 to 2026
$5.6M
RESEARCH TRACK RADIOLOGY RESIDENCYT32EB004311 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Terence P Gade, Misun Hwang · 2005 to 2026
$4.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001631NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMost brain lesions are characterized by hyperintense signal on FLAIR. We sought to develop an automated deep learning-based method for segmentation of abnormalities on FLAIR and volumetric quantification on clinical brain MRIs across many pathologic entities and scanning parameters. We evaluated the performance of the algorithm compared with manual segmentation and existing automated methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe adapted a U-Net convolutional neural network architecture for brain MRIs using 3D volumes. This network was retrospectively trained on 295 brain MRIs to perform automated FLAIR lesion segmentation. Performance was evaluated on 92 validation cases using Dice scores and voxelwise sensitivity and specificity, compared with radiologists' manual segmentations. The algorithm was also evaluated on measuring total lesion volume.

resultsOur model demonstrated accurate FLAIR lesion segmentation performance (median Dice score, 0.79) on the validation dataset across a large range of lesion characteristics. Across 19 neurologic diseases, performance was significantly higher than existing methods (Dice, 0.56 and 0.41) and approached human performance (Dice, 0.81). There was a strong correlation between the predictions of lesion volume of the algorithm compared with true lesion volume (ρ = 0.99). Lesion segmentations were accurate across a large range of image-acquisition parameters on >30 different MR imaging scanners.

conclusionsA 3D convolutional neural network adapted from a U-Net architecture can achieve high automated FLAIR segmentation performance on clinical brain MR imaging across a variety of underlying pathologies and image acquisition parameters. The method provides accurate volumetric lesion data that can be incorporated into assessments of disease burden or into radiologic reports.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain DiseasesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31345943
PMCPMC6697209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.