ArticleCMAJ open
An online educational module on transfusion safety and appropriateness for resident physicians: a controlled before-after quality-improvement study.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interrupted Time Series Analysis for Quality Improvement Projects.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2026Article
- Knowledge assessment of Tunisian junior doctors in transfusion medicine.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Let Us Know Transfusion Triggers for Prophylactic Use of Platelet Concentrate-Analysis of Compliance with Recent Transfusion Guidelines in a Large Academic Medical Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of Blood Transfusion Rates Before and After Implementation of a Quality Improvement Initiative for Transfusion Safety and Appropriateness.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study.CMAJ openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral professional societies have made value-based statements in support of restrictive transfusion strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whether completion of an accredited online training program in transfusion safety could improve transfusion knowledge among medical residents and increase transfusion appropriateness.
methodsWe performed a controlled before-after evaluation of a mandatory accredited self-directed training program (Bloody Easy Lite for Physicians) that provides education about transfusion medicine on a 47-bed medical clinical teaching unit at a university-affiliated hospital centre in Montréal. The program consists of 2 modules and takes about 30 minutes to complete. We used the 45-bed medical teaching unit at another Montréal hospital as a contemporary control. We compared resident physicians' pre- and posttest scores and evaluated the impact on transfusion appropriateness by comparing the proportion occurring below a hemoglobin concentration of 80 g/L before (April 2013-June 2015) and after (July 2015-January 2016) the intervention.
resultsOf the 55 residents on the intervention unit, 53 (96%) completed the training. The median pretest score was 50% (inter-quartile range [IQR] 40%-60%). The median posttest score was 90% (IQR 80%-90%) for module 1 and 80% (IQR 80%-90%) for module 2 (
interpretationMandatory training in transfusion safety via an online program resulted in improved transfusion knowledge among residents and an increase in the proportion of transfusions occurring at a hemoglobin concentration below 80 g/L. This low-cost educational initiative may improve transfusion appropriateness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.