Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345227›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2019

Estimating health state utility from activities of daily living in the French National Hospital Discharge Database: a feasibility study with head and neck cancer.

Michaël Schwarzinger, Stéphane Luchini, EPICORL Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Health state utility values by cancer stage: a systematic literature review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michaël SchwarzingerTranslational Health Economics Network (THEN), 39 quai de Valmy, 75010, Paris, France. Michael.schwarzinger@transhealthecon.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-6856
Stéphane LuchiniAix-Marseille University (Aix-Marseille School of Economics), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and EHESS Marseille, Marseille, France.
EPICORL Study Group

Funding

MSD France EPICORL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth state utility (HSU) is a core component of QALYs and cost-effectiveness analysis, although HSU is rarely estimated among a representative sample of patients. We explored the feasibility of assessing HSU in head and neck cancer from the French National Hospital Discharge database.

methodsAn exhaustive sample of 53,258 incident adult patients with a first diagnosis of head and neck cancer was identified in 2010-2012. We used a cross-sectional approach to define five health states over two periods: three "cancer stages at initial treatment" (early, locally advanced or metastatic stage); a "relapse state" and otherwise a "relapse-free state" in the follow-up of patients initially treated at early or locally advanced stage. In patients admitted in post-acute care, a two-parameter graded response model (Item Response Theory) was estimated from all 144,012 records of six Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and the latent health state scale underlying ADLs was calibrated with the French EQ-5D-3 L social value set. Following linear interpolation between all assessments of the patient, daily estimates of utility in post-acute care were averaged by health state, patient and month of follow-up. Finally, HSU was estimated by health state and month of follow-up for the whole patient population after controlling for survivorship and selection in post-acute care.

resultsHead and neck cancer was generally associated with poor HSU estimates in a real-life setting. As compared to "distant metastasis at initial treatment", mean HSU was higher in other health states, although numerical differences were small (0.45 versus around 0.54). It was primarily explained by the negative effects on HSU of an older age (38.4% aged ≥70 years in "early stage at initial treatment") and comorbidities (> 50% in other health states). HSU estimates significantly improved over time in the "relapse-free state" (from 8 to 12 months of follow-up).

conclusionsHSU estimates in head and neck cancer were primarily driven by age at diagnosis, comorbidities, and time to assessment of cancer survivors. This feasibility study highlights the potential of estimating HSU within and across severe conditions in a systematic way at the national level.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFeasibility StudiesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeQuality-Adjusted Life YearsActivities of daily livingCost-effectiveness analysisEQ-5D-3LHead and neck cancerHealth state utilityItem response theoryNational hospital discharge databaseQALYs

Identifiers

PMID31345227
PMCPMC6659251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.