Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345202›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

The role of WhatsApp® in medical education; a scoping review and instructional design model.

E Coleman, E O'Connor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05520671 (Evaluating TESLA-G, a Gamified, Telegram-delivered, Quizzing Platform for Surgical Education in Medical Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05520671 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating TESLA-G, a Gamified, Telegram-delivered, Quizzing Platform for Surgical Education in Medical Students: a Protocol for a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsSurgical Education in Medical StudentsArmsGamified online quizzing platform, Conventional quizzing platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. What's up with WhatsApp in supplementing surgical education: an objective assessment.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Utilisation of WhatsApp for Emergency Medical Services in Garissa, Kenya.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E ColemanDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesia, St James's Hospital, Trinity College, Dublin 8, Dublin, Ireland. eamonn.m.coleman@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-6061
E O'ConnorDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesia, St James's Hospital, Trinity College, Dublin 8, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological advances have driven huge change in educational practices though concerns exist about a lack of evidence informing this change, in particular with social media-based medical education activities. The purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review of WhatsApp use in medical education, narratively describing how it has been used and evaluated, and the theoretical considerations in relevant articles.

methodsA modified 5-stage scoping review model was used. We performed 2 searches from February 2009 to February 2019 in EBSCO, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline PubMed and Google Scholar) using the term "WhatsApp" in all search fields. A 3-stage process for study selection was performed. Only original articles in English presenting original data about WhatsApp in medical education were included. The Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation was used to describe learning outcomes in included studies.

resultsTwenty-three articles were selected for review. Three strategies for WhatsApp use were apparent; primarily educational use with a pre-defined curriculum (n = 5), primarily educational use without a curriculum (n = 11), and primarily non-educational use (n = 7). Most of the educational studies used an online moderator and were in a local hospital or university department. Studies not primarily educational were national or international and seldom included an online moderator. All 5 studies with a pre-defined curriculum reported Kirkpatrick level 2 learner knowledge outcomes. A majority of the remaining studies only reported Kirkpatrick level 1 learner attitudes. Seven studies with 647 participants reported an improvement in learners' knowledge following WhatsApp learning, though methodological weaknesses were apparent. Evidence for underlying learning theory considerations were scant throughout the studies.

conclusionsWhatsApp is popular and convenient in medical education. Current published literature suggests it may also be effective as a medical learning tool. By combining the 3 strategies for WhatsApp use and the exploration-enactment-assessment integrated learning design framework, we propose an instant messenger design model for medical education. This may address the need for theory-driven instructional design in social media learning. Further research would clarify the role of WhatsApp and our design model in this area.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalModels, EducationalSoftwareClinical CompetenceCurriculumBlended learningeLearningInstant messenger applicationsLearning theorymLearningSocial media learning

Identifiers

PMID31345202
PMCPMC6659203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.