Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345196›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

Talking about end of life in general palliative care - what's going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark.

Heidi Bergenholtz, Helle Ussing Timm, Malene Missel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heidi BergenholtzHolbaek Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300, Holbæk, Region Zealand, Denmark. hbz@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-0019
Helle Ussing TimmREHPA, Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Vestergade 17, 5800, Nyborg, Denmark.
Malene MisselRigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2000, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF17OC0029010Region Sjælland RSSF2017000644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnd-of-life (EOL) conversations in hospital should serve to give patients the opportunity to consider future treatment options and help them clarify their values and wishes before it becomes relevant to make decisions about treatment. However, it is known that EOL conversations are not performed systematically in hospital. This may mean that patients and their relatives do not address EOL issues. There is a lack of knowledge about who is responsible for conducting these conversations, and when and under what circumstances they are conducted. The aim of this study was to explore the existing practices regarding EOL conversations in an acute care hospital setting.

methodsThe design was Interpretive Description and the methods for the data collection included: 1. Participatory observational studies in a pulmonary medical and surgical ward (a total of 66 h); 2. Four focus group interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 14) from the wards. The analysis followed Spradley's ethnosemantic analysis.

resultsThe results revealed three cultural categories related to: 1. The physical and organizational setting; 2. The timing of EOL conversations and competencies and roles in addressing EOL issues and 3. Topics addressed in EOL conversations. The EOL conversations were part of daily clinical practice, but there was a lack of competencies, roles were unclear and the physical and organizational environment was not conducive to the conversations. The topics of the EOL conversations revolved around a "here-and-now" status of the patient's disease progression and decisions about the level of treatment. To a lesser extent, the conversations included the patient's and relatives' thoughts and wishes concerning EOL, which allowed long-term care planning.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that there are several barriers to talking about EOL in an acute care hospital setting, and future strategies must address an overall approach. In order to provide patients and their relatives with better opportunities to express their EOL wishes, there is a need for clearer roles and guidelines in an interdisciplinary approach to EOL conversations, alongside improved staff competencies and changes to the organizational and physical environment.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleFocus GroupsHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTerminal CareConversationEnd-of-lifeEthnographyGeneralist palliative careHospitalInterpretive descriptionPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID31345196
PMCPMC6657144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.