Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345181›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2019

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and outcome of ischemic stroke in non-diabetic patients - a prospective observational study.

Daniel Åberg, N David Åberg, Katarina Jood, Lukas Holmegaard, Petra Redfors, Christian Blomstrand, Jörgen Isgaard, Christina Jern, Johan Svensson

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel ÅbergDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. daniel.aberg@medic.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0517-6331
N David ÅbergDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Katarina JoodDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lukas HolmegaardDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Petra RedforsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christian BlomstrandCenter of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jörgen IsgaardDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christina JernDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan SvenssonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Swedish Government ALFGBG-438631the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation 20100256The Swedish Research Council K2011-65X-14605-09-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsulin resistance (IR) in relation to diabetes is a risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS), whereas less is known about non-diabetic IR and outcome after IS.

methodsIn non-diabetic IS (n = 441) and controls (n = 560) from the Sahlgrenska Academy Study on Ischemic Stroke (SAHLSIS), IR was investigated in relation to IS severity and functional outcome. IR was evaluated acutely and after 3 months using the Homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). Stroke severity was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Functional outcome was evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 3 months, 2 and 7 years. Associations were evaluated by logistic regression.

resultsHigher acute and 3-month HOMA-IR was observed in IS compared to the controls (both p < 0.001) and in severe compared to mild IS (both p < 0.05). High acute HOMA-IR was associated with poor outcome (mRS 3-6) after 3 months and 7 years [crude Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 1.50, 1.07-2.11 and 1.59, 1.11-2.30, respectively], but not after 2 years. These associations lost significance after adjustment for all covariates including initial stroke severity. In the largest IS subtype (cryptogenic stroke), acute HOMA-IR was associated with poor outcome after 2 years also after adjustment for age and stroke severity (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.01-8.12).

conclusionsIn non-diabetic IS patients, HOMA-IR was elevated and related to stroke severity, but after adjustment for IS severity, the associations between HOMR-IR and poor outcome lost significance. This could suggest that elevated IR mostly is a part of the acute IS morbidity. However, in the subgroup of cryptogenic stroke, the associations with poor outcome withstood correction for stroke severity.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceBrain IschemiaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHomeostasisHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeHOMA-IRInsulin resistanceIschemic strokeModified Rankin scale

Identifiers

PMID31345181
PMCPMC6657049
OpenAlexW2964147750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.