Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345167›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2019

Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices.

Michael L Parchman, Melissa L Anderson, Katie Coleman, Le Ann Michaels, Linnaea Schuttner, Cullen Conway, Clarissa Hsu, Lyle J Fagnan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02839382 (The Northwest Coalition for Primary Care Practice Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02839382 nacompletednot on this map

The Northwest Coalition for Primary Care Practice Support

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2015 to 2018Enrolled209ConditionsCardiovascular Disease, Essential Hypertension, Nicotine Dependence, HyperlipidemiaArmsCoaching, Educational Outreach, Site Visits
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael L ParchmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. michael.x.parchman@kp.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-2889
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Katie ColemanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Le Ann MichaelsOregon Rural Practice Research Network, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
Linnaea SchuttnerVA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cullen ConwayOregon Rural Practice Research Network, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
Clarissa HsuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Lyle J FagnanOregon Rural Practice Research Network, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality R18HS023908NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) is a study of external support strategies to build quality improvement (QI) capacity in primary care with a focus on cardiovascular risk factors: appropriate aspirin use, blood pressure control, and tobacco screening/cessation.

methodsTo guide practice facilitator support, experts in practice transformation identified seven domains of QI capacity and mapped items from a previously validated medical home assessment tool to them. A practice facilitator (PF) met with clinicians and staff in each practice to discuss each item on the Quality Improvement Capacity Assessment (QICA) resulting in a practice-level response to each item. We examined the association between the QICA total and sub-scale scores, practice characteristics, a measure of prior experience with managing practice change, and performance on clinical quality measures (CQMs) for the three cardiovascular risk factors.

resultsThe QICA score was associated with prior experience managing change and moderately associated with two of the three CQMs: aspirin use (r = 0.16, p = 0.049) and blood pressure control (r = 0.18, p = 0.013). Rural practices and those with 2-5 clinicians had lower QICA scores..

conclusionsThe QICA is useful for assessing QI capacity within a practice and may serve as a guide for both facilitators and primary care practices in efforts to build this capacity and improve measures of clinical quality.

trial registrationThis trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier# NCT02839382, retrospectively registered on July 21, 2016.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesHumansHypertensionIdahoOregonPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationTobacco Use CessationWashingtonAspirinPatient care teamPrimary health careProcess assessmentQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31345167
PMCPMC6657073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.