ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C to Diagnose Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Pre-Hospital Setting.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: From Sarcomeric Injury Biology to Decision-Grade Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Prognostic value of point-of-care testing for cardiac myosin-binding protein C in early risk assessment of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in biomarkers for myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Biomarker Profiling of Cardiac Causes for Chest Pain in Non-acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in West Virginia.Cureus · 2026Article
- Cardiac myosin-binding protein-C levels are associated with severity and prognosis in stable coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of combining cardiac myosin-binding protein C and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients without acute coronary syndrome treated at medical cardiac intensive care units.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Single- and Dual-Marker Strategies for Rapid Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Rule-Out Using Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C, Copeptin, and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Evaluation of Novel Biomarkers Compared to ESC 0/1 h and 0/3 h Algorithms in Patients with Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Beyond troponins: Emerging diagnostic significance of novel markers in NSTEMI.Global cardiology science & practice · 2024Article
- Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of acute myocardial infarction.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023Review
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict the Future Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Left Ventricular Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction: From Physiopathology to Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A 0/1h-algorithm using cardiac myosin-binding protein C for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2022Article
- Past, Present, and Future of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Promises and Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C to Diagnose Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Pre-Hospital Setting.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background Early triage is essential to improve outcomes in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study investigated whether cMyC (cardiac myosin-binding protein), a novel biomarker of myocardial necrosis, can aid early diagnosis of AMI and risk stratification. Methods and Results cMyC and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T were retrospectively quantified in blood samples obtained by ambulance-based paramedics in a prospective, diagnostic cohort study. Patients with ongoing or prolonged periods of chest discomfort, acute dyspnoea in the absence of known pulmonary disease, or clinical suspicion of AMI were recruited. Discrimination power was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve; diagnostic performance was assessed at predefined thresholds. Diagnostic nomograms were derived and validated using bootstrap resampling in logistic regression models. Seven hundred seventy-six patients with median age 68 [58;78] were recruited. AMI was the final adjudicated diagnosis in 22%. Median symptom to sampling time was 70 minutes. cMyC concentration in patients with AMI was significantly higher than with other diagnoses: 98 [43;855] versus 17 [9;42] ng/L. Discrimination power for AMI was better with cMyC than with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (area under the curve, 0.839 versus 0.813; P=0.005). At a previously published rule-out threshold (10 ng/L), cMyC reaches 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value in patients after 2 hours of symptoms. In logistic regression analysis, cMyC is superior to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and was used to derive diagnostic and prognostic nomograms to evaluate risk of AMI and death. Conclusions In patients undergoing blood draws very early after symptom onset, cMyC demonstrates improved diagnostic discrimination of AMI and could significantly improve the early triage of patients with suspected AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.