Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31345006›Full record

ArticleRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia2019

[Consensus document for sepsis code implementation and development in the Community of Madrid].

E Palencia Herrejón, J González Del Castillo, F Ramasco Rueda, F J Candel, B Sánchez Artola, A von Wernitz Teleki, F Gordo Vidal, P Roces Iglesias, G Bejarano Redondo, D A Rodríguez Serrano and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Unresolved issues in the epidemiology and diagnosis of bacteremia: an opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  6. [Current situation of sepsis care in Spanish emergency departments].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Article
  7. Impact of the implementation of a Sepsis Code Program in medical patient management: a cohort study in an Internal Medicine ward.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Article
  8. [Sepsis Code: dodging mortality in a tertiary hospital].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E Palencia HerrejónEduardo Palencia Herrerón, Servicio de Medicina Intensiva. Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor. Madrid, Spain. epalenciah@salud.madrid.org.
J González Del Castillo
F Ramasco Rueda
F J Candel
B Sánchez Artola
A von Wernitz Teleki
F Gordo Vidal
P Roces Iglesias
G Bejarano Redondo
D A Rodríguez Serrano
F J Cobo Reinoso
E Corral Torres
M Martí de Gracia
A Ruiz Álvarez
y el Grupo Multidisciplinar Código Sepsis Madrid
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consensus paper for the implementation and development of the sepsis code, finished in April 2017 is presented here. It was adopted by the Regional Office of Health as a working document for the implementation of the sepsis code in the Community of Madrid, both in the hospital setting (acute, middle and long-stay hospitals) and in Primary Care and Out-of-Hospital Emergency Services. It is now published without changes with respect to the original version, having only added the most significant bibliographical references. The document is divided into four parts: introduction, initial detection and assessment, early therapy and organizational recommendations. In the second to fourth sections, 25 statements or proposals have been included, agreed upon by the authors after several face-to-face meetings and an extensive "online" discussion. The annex includes nine tables that are intended as a practical guide to the activation of the sepsis code. Both the content of the recommendations and their formal writing have been made taking into account their applicability in all areas to which they are directed, which may have very different structural and functional characteristics and features, so that we have deliberately avoided a greater degree of concretion: the objective is not that the sepsis code is organized and applied identically in all of them, but that the health resources work in a coordinated manner aligned in the same direction.

Indexed as

Emergency TreatmentOrgan Dysfunction ScoresAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersChecklistCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionDecision Making, OrganizationalEarly DiagnosisEmergency Medical ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNorepinephrinePatient Care TeamSepsisSpainAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID31345006
PMCPMC6719654
OpenAlexW2982389981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.