ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
On Secure Simple Pairing in Bluetooth Standard v5.0-Part II: Privacy Analysis and Enhancement for Low Energy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cybersecurity Analysis of Wearable Devices: Smartwatches Passive Attack.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bluetooth low energy devices are very popular in wireless personal area networks. According to the Bluetooth standard specifications, the low energy secure simple pairing (LESSP) protocol is the process by which the pairing devices negotiate the authenticated secret key. To violate the user privacy, the adversary can perhaps link the runs of the LESSP protocol to the targeted device, which usually relates to the specially appointed user. Hence, we investigate deep into the privacy of the LESSP protocol. Our main contributions are threefold: (1) We demonstrate that the LESSP protocol suffers from privacy vulnerability. That is, an adversary without any secret key is able to identify the targeted device by the LESSP protocol. (2) An improvement is therefore proposed to repair the privacy vulnerability in the LESSP protocol. (3) We develop a formal privacy model to evaluate the privacy vulnerabilities in the LESSP protocol and its improved versions. We further prove that our improvement on the LESSP protocol is private under the privacy model. In addition, the performance evaluation shows that our improvement is as efficient as the LESSP protocol. Our research results are beneficial to the privacy enhancement of Bluetooth systems in wireless personal area networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.