Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344903›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Intervertebral Disc Nucleus Repair: Hype or Hope?

Gauri Tendulkar, Tao Chen, Sabrina Ehnert, Hans-Peter Kaps, Andreas K Nüssler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Towards biomimetic evolution of artificial intervertebral disc: a review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. BionateJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A crucial exosome-related gene pair (Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gauri TendulkarSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research at the BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Tao ChenSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research at the BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1156-2899
Sabrina EhnertSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research at the BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Peter KapsSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research at the BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas K NüsslerSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research at the BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. andreas.nuessler@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-6791
BG Klinik Tübingen · DE

Funding

Zentrales Innovations program Mittelstand (ZIM) des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie KF3010902AJ4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic back pain is a common disability, which is often accredited to intervertebral disc degeneration. Gold standard interventions such as spinal fusion, which are mainly designed to mechanically seal the defect, frequently fail to restore the native biomechanics. Moreover, artificial implants have limited success as a repair strategy, as they do not alter the underlying disease and fail to promote tissue integration and subsequent native biomechanics. The reported high rates of spinal fusion and artificial disc implant failure have pushed intervertebral disc degeneration research in recent years towards repair strategies. Intervertebral disc repair utilizing principles of tissue engineering should theoretically be successful, overcoming the inadequacies of artificial implants. For instance, advances in the development of scaffolds aided with cells and growth factors have opened up new possibilities for repair strategies. However, none has reached the stage of clinical trials in humans. In this review, we describe the hitches encountered in the musculoskeletal field and summarize recent advances in designing tissue-engineered constructs for promoting nucleus pulposus repair. Additionally, the review focuses on the effect of biomaterial aided with cells and growth factors on achieving effective functional reparative potency, highlighting the ways to enhance the efficacy of these treatments.

Indexed as

Back PainBiocompatible MaterialsCell NucleusHumansIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationNucleus PulposusTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsintervertebral discnucleus pulposusrepairreplacementscaffold

Identifiers

PMID31344903
PMCPMC6696292
OpenAlexW2963683233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.