Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344902›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Comparison of Data Fusion Methods as Consensus Scores for Ensemble Docking.

Dávid Bajusz, Anita Rácz, Károly Héberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Extended many-item similarity indices for sets of nucleotide and protein sequences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dávid BajuszMedicinal Chemistry Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-9481
Anita RáczPlasma Chemistry Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary. racz.anita@ttk.mta.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-8271-9841
Károly HébergerPlasma Chemistry Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal K116904Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal K119269Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal KH_17 125608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensemble docking is a widely applied concept in structure-based virtual screening-to at least partly account for protein flexibility-usually granting a significant performance gain at a modest cost of speed. From the individual, single-structure docking scores, a consensus score needs to be produced by data fusion: this is usually done by taking the best docking score from the available pool (in most cases- and in this study as well-this is the minimum score). Nonetheless, there are a number of other fusion rules that can be applied. We report here the results of a detailed statistical comparison of seven fusion rules for ensemble docking, on five case studies of current drug targets, based on four performance metrics. Sevenfold cross-validation and variance analysis (ANOVA) allowed us to highlight the best fusion rules. The results are presented in bubble plots, to unite the four performance metrics into a single, comprehensive image. Notably, we suggest the use of the geometric and harmonic means as better alternatives to the generally applied minimum fusion rule.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAlgorithmsBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveWorkflowLigandsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAUCBEDROCdata fusionensemble dockingROC curveSRD

Identifiers

PMID31344902
PMCPMC6695709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.