ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019
Animal Images Database: Validation of 120 Images for Human-Animal Studies.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Taxonomic Bias Persists in Ecology and Evolution Research Despite Decades of Concern.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Drivers of Taxonomic Bias in Ecology and Evolution: Insights From Ethologists and Behavioural Ecologists.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Empathy for pain in humans and animals differs based on species, psychosocial and cultural factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Beyond stimulus-response rules: Task sets incorporate information about performance difficulty.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025Article
- Introducing the trier univalence neutrality ambivalence (TUNA) database: A picture database differentiating complex attitudes.PloS one · 2024Article
- Revisiting the Motivated Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Food: Replication Registered Report of Bastian et al. ().International review of social psychology · 2024Article
- Speciesism in everyday language.The British journal of social psychology · 2023Article
- Animate monitoring is not uniform: implications for the animate monitoring hypothesis.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Independent subsequent memory effects of conflict resolution and response inhibition.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Ideological resistance to veg*n advocacy: An identity-based motivational account.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Emotions triggered by live arthropods shed light on spider phobia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Ultimate List of the Most Frightening and Disgusting Animals: Negative Emotions Elicited by Animals in Central European Respondents.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been increasing interest in the study of human-animal relations. This contrasts with the lack of normative resources and materials for research purposes. We present subjective norms for a set of 120 open-source colour images of animals spanning a total of 12 biological categories (e.g., mammals, insects, reptiles, arachnids). Participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.