Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344677›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2019

Using an Electronic Tablet to Assess Patients' Home Environment by Videoconferencing Prior to Hospital Discharge: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Feasibility and Comparative Study.

Karine Latulippe, Véronique Provencher, Katia Boivin, Claude Vincent, Manon Guay, Dahlia Kairy, Ernesto Morales, Marc-André Pellerin, Dominique Giroux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karine LatulippeCenter of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-6498
Véronique ProvencherSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8211-7135
Katia BoivinCHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-7510
Claude VincentDepartment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5292-4035
Manon GuaySchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-9327
Dahlia KairySchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-6607
Ernesto MoralesDepartment of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6488-5093
Marc-André PellerinCHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6919-5414
Dominique GirouxCenter of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-5319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational therapists working in hospitals are usually involved in discharge planning to assess patients' safety and autonomy upon returning home. However, their assessment is usually done at the hospital due to organizational and financial constraints. The lack of visual data about the patients' home may thus reduce the appropriateness and applicability of the support recommended upon discharge. Although various technological tools such as mobile devices (mobile health) are promising methods for home-based distance assessment, their application in hospital settings may raise several feasibility issues. To our knowledge, their usefulness and added value compared to standard procedure have not been addressed yet in previous studies. Moreover, several feasibility issues need to be explored.

objectiveThis paper aims to (1) document the clinical feasibility of using an electronic tablet to assess the patient's home environment by mobile videoconferencing and (2) explore the added value of using mobile videoconferencing, compared to the standard procedure.

methodsA feasibility and comparative study using a mixed-methods (convergent) design is currently undergoing. Six occupational therapists will assess the home environment of their patients in the hospital setting: they will first perform a semistructured interview (a) and then use mobile videoconferencing (b) to compare "a versus a+b." Interviews with occupational therapists and patients and their caregivers will further explore the advantages and disadvantages of mobile videoconferencing. Two valid tools are used (the Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance and the telehealth responsivity questionnaire). Direct and indirect time is also collected.

resultsThe project was funded in the spring of 2016 and authorized by the ethics committee in February 2017. Enrollment started in April 2017. Five triads (n=4 occupational therapists, n=5 clients, n=5 caregivers) have been recruited until now. The experiment is expected to be completed by April 2019 and analysis of the results by June 2019.

conclusionsMobile videoconferencing may be a familiar and easy solution for visualizing environmental barriers in the home by caregivers and clinicians, thus providing a promising and inexpensive option to promote a safe return home upon hospital discharge, but clinical feasibility and obstacles to the use of mobile videoconferencing must be understood. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11674.

Indexed as

caregiversfeasibilitymixed-methodsmobile phonemobile videoconferencingoccupational therapists

Identifiers

PMID31344677
PMCPMC6682277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.