Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344487›Full record

ArticleInfection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases2019

The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata.

S D Larcombe, S W Kolte, G Ponnudurai, N Kurkure, S Magar, R Velusamy, N Rani, B Rubinibala, B Rekha, A Alagesan and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S D LarcombeInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: stephen.larcombe@ed.ac.uk.
S W KolteDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Nagpur, India.
G PonnuduraiDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, India.
N KurkureDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Nagpur, India.
S MagarDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Nagpur, India.
R VelusamyDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Nagpur, India.
N RaniDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Nagpur, India.
B RubinibalaDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, India.
B RekhaDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, India.
A AlagesanDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, India.
W WeirSchool of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Scotland G61 1QH, UK.
B R ShielsInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK.
Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University · INUniversity of Glasgow · GBTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · IN

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L004739/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne pathogens (TBP) are a major source of production loss and a welfare concern in livestock across the globe. Consequently, there is a trade-off between keeping animals that are tolerant to TBP infection, but are less productive than more susceptible breeds. Theileria annulata is a major TBP of bovines, with different host types (i.e. exotic and native cattle breeds, and buffalo) displaying demonstrable differences in clinical susceptibility to infection. However, the extent to which these differences are driven by genetic/physiological differences between hosts, or by different parasite populations/genotypes preferentially establishing infection in different host breeds and species is unclear. In this study, three different bovine host types in India were blood sampled to test for the presence of various TBP, including Theileria annulata, to determine whether native cattle (Bos indicus breeds), crossbreed cattle (Bos taurus x Bos indicus breeds) or water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) differ in the physiological consequences of infection. Population genetic analyses of T. annulata isolated from the three different host types was also performed, using a panel of mini- and micro-satellite markers, to test for sub-structuring of the parasite population among host types. We discovered that compared to other host types, "carrier" crossbreed cattle showed a higher level of haematological pathology when infected with T. annulata. Despite this finding, we found no evidence for differences in the genotypes of T. annulata infecting different host types, although buffalo appeared to harbour fewer mixed parasite genotype infections, indicating they are not the major reservoir of parasite diversity. The apparent tolerance/resistance of native breed cattle and buffalo to the impacts of T. annulata infection is thus most likely to be driven by host genotype, rather than differences in the parasite population. Our results suggest that an improved understanding of the genetic factors that underpin disease resistance could help to ameliorate future economic loss due to TBP or tropical theileriosis.

Indexed as

GenotypeHost SpecificityAnimalsBuffaloesCattleDisease ReservoirsIndiaTheileria annulataTheileriasisAnaplasmaApicomplexaBreed resistanceCattleMicrosatellitesTheileria annulata

Identifiers

PMID31344487
PMCPMC6853275
OpenAlexW2963086165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.