Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344484›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Distinctions among real and apparent respiratory motions in human fMRI data.

Jonathan D Power, Charles J Lynch, Benjamin M Silver, Marc J Dubin, Alex Martin, Rebecca M Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan D PowerSackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, Box 140, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Electronic address: jdp9009@nyp.org.
Charles J LynchBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, Box 140, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Electronic address: cjl2007@med.cornell.edu.
Benjamin M SilverSackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, Box 140, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Electronic address: bes2037@med.cornell.edu.
Marc J DubinDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, Box 140, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Electronic address: mrd9035@med.cornell.edu.
Alex MartinNational Institute for Mental Health, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA. Electronic address: alexmartin@mail.nih.gov.
Rebecca M JonesSackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, Box 140, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Electronic address: rej2004@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

The Neural Foundations for Memory and Social Cognition In The Human BrainZIAMH002588 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARTIN, ALEX · 2009 to 2025
$21.1M
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Autism Spectrum DisordersZIAMH002920 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARTIN, ALEX · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002588Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head motion estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans appear qualitatively different with sub-second image sampling rates compared to the multi-second sampling rates common in the past. Whereas formerly the head appeared still for much of a scan with brief excursions from baseline, the head now appears to be in constant motion, and motion estimates often seem to divulge little information about what is happening in a scan. This constant motion has been attributed to respiratory oscillations that do not alias at faster sampling rates, and investigators are divided on the extent to which such motion is "real" motion or only "apparent" pseudomotion. Some investigators have abandoned the use of motion estimates entirely due to these considerations. Here we investigate the properties of motion in several fMRI datasets sampled at rates between 720 and 1160 ms, and describe 5 distinct kinds of respiratory motion: 1) constant real respiratory motion in the form of head nodding most evident in vertical position and pitch, which can be very large; 2) constant pseudomotion at the same respiratory rate as real motion, occurring only in the phase encode direction; 3) punctate real motions occurring at times of very deep breaths; 4) a low-frequency pseudomotion in only the phase encode direction at and after very deep breaths; 5) slow modulation of vertical and anterior-posterior head position by the respiratory envelope. We reformulate motion estimates in light of these considerations and obtain good concordance between motion estimates, physiologic records, image quality measures, and events evident in the fMRI signals. We demonstrate how variables describing respiration or body habitus separately scale with distinct kinds of head motion. We also note heritable aspects of respiration and motion.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRespirationAdolescentArtifactsChildFemaleHeadHumansMaleMovement

Identifiers

PMID31344484
PMCPMC6765416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.