Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344434›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019

Net Pain Relief After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Useful Measure to Reflect Response Duration? A Further Analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study.

Katie Spencer, Galina Velikova, Ann Henry, Paulien Westhoff, Pe Ter Hall, Yvette M van der Linden

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cost-utility of focused ultrasound compared to radiotherapy for Dutch patients with uncomplicated non-spinal bone metastases.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie SpencerLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. Electronic address: katie.spencer1@nhs.net.
Galina VelikovaLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Ann HenryLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Paulien WesthoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pe Ter HallEdinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Yvette M van der LindenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
University of Leeds · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBLeiden University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N021339/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePain response rates are equivalent after single 8 Gy and fractionated palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases. Reirradiation remains more frequent after a single fraction, although this does not simply reflect pain recurrence. Given the possible role of stereotactic radiation therapy in providing durable pain control, measures of durability are required. Net pain relief (NPR), the proportion of remaining life spent with pain response, may provide this. This study assesses the use of NPR as an outcome measure after palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a secondary analysis of data collected in the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, a randomized trial comparing palliative radiation therapy delivered as 8 Gy in a single fraction and 24 Gy in 6 fractions. NPR was assessed by survival cohorts, treatment regimen, and primary diagnoses. The consequences of missing data upon the use of NPR in future studies were considered within sensitivity analyses.

resultsPatients whose pain improved after palliative radiation therapy experienced improvement for 56.6% of their remaining lives. Missing responses in questionnaires mean the range of uncertainty in NPR is 36.1% to 62.1%. When response beyond reirradiation was excluded, NPR after treatments of single-fraction 8 Gy and 24 Gy in 6 fractions was 49.0% and 56.5%, respectively (P = .004). Differential willingness to reirradiate may be influencing this outcome. When response beyond reirradiation was included, this difference was not seen (NPR of 55.4% vs 57.7%, respectively [P = .191]).

conclusionsPatients who responded to conventional radiation therapy experienced improved pain control for approximately half of their remaining life. NPR may provide valuable information in assessing pain response durability. Missing data are, however, inevitable in this population. This must be minimized and the consequences recognized and reported. Additionally, reirradiation protocols and the frequency and duration of trial follow-up may have a significant impact upon this outcome, requiring careful consideration during trial design if NPR is to be used in future studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidBone NeoplasmsCancer PainDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain ManagementPalliative CareAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID31344434
PMCPMC6859481
OpenAlexW2964184003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.