ArticlePloS one2019
Genomic selection for productive traits in biparental cassava breeding populations.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating genetic gain through integrated genomic selection in crop plants.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- High-Throughput Phenotyping for Agronomic Traits in Cassava Using Aerial Imaging.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hybrid Prediction in Horticulture Crop Breeding: Progress and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Phenotypic Variability in Resistance to Anthracnose, White, Brown, and Blight Leaf Spot in Cassava Germplasm.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimizing drought tolerance in cassava through genomic selection.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- New protocol for rapid cassava multiplication in field conditions: a perspective on speed breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Cassava Tuberous Roots in Response to Postharvest Physiological Deterioration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Genomic prediction in family bulks using different traits and cross-validations in pine.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Genetics and breeding for climate change in Orphan crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Review
- Can Cross-Country Genomic Predictions Be a Reasonable Strategy to Support Germplasm Exchange? - A Case Study With Hydrogen Cyanide in Cassava.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Breeding and biotechnological interventions for trait improvement: status and prospects.Planta · 2020Review
- Technological Innovations for Improving Cassava Production in Sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cassava improvement using traditional breeding strategies is slow due to the species' long breeding cycle. However, the use of genomic selection can lead to a shorter breeding cycle. This study aimed to estimate genetic parameters for productive traits based on pedigree (pedigree and phenotypic information) and genomic (markers and phenotypic information) analyses using biparental crosses at different stages of selection. A total of 290 clones were genotyped and phenotyped for fresh root yield (FRY), dry matter content (DMC), dry yield (DY), fresh shoot yield (FSY) and harvest index (HI). The clones were evaluated in clonal evaluation trials (CET), preliminary yield trials (PYT), advanced yield trials (AYT) and uniform yield trials (UYT), from 2013 to 2018 in ten locations. The breeding stages were analyzed as follows: one stage (CET), two stages (CET and PYT), three stages (CET, PYT and AYT) and four stages (CET, PYT, AYT and UYT). The genomic predictions were analyzed via k-fold cross-validation based on the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) considering a model with genetic additive effects and genotype × location interactions. Genomic and pedigree accuracies were moderate to high (0.56-0.72 and 0.62-0.78, respectively) for important starch-related traits such as DY and FRY; when considering one breeding stage (CET) with the aim of early selection, the genomic accuracies ranged from 0.60 (DMC) to 0.71 (HI). Moreover, the correlations between the genomic estimation breeding values of one-stage genomic analysis and the estimated breeding values of the four-stage (full data set) pedigree analysis were high for all traits as well as for a selection index including all traits. The results indicate great possibilities for genomic selection in cassava, especially for selection early in the breeding cycle (saving time and effort).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.