Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344109›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Genomic selection for productive traits in biparental cassava breeding populations.

Lívia Gomes Torres, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende, Camila Ferreira Azevedo, Fabyano Fonseca E Silva, Eder Jorge de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetics and breeding for climate change in Orphan crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lívia Gomes TorresDepartment of Plant Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcos Deon Vilela de ResendeDepartment of Forestry Engineering, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Camila Ferreira AzevedoDepartment of Statistics, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0438-5123
Fabyano Fonseca E SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Eder Jorge de OliveiraEmbrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8992-7459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cassava improvement using traditional breeding strategies is slow due to the species' long breeding cycle. However, the use of genomic selection can lead to a shorter breeding cycle. This study aimed to estimate genetic parameters for productive traits based on pedigree (pedigree and phenotypic information) and genomic (markers and phenotypic information) analyses using biparental crosses at different stages of selection. A total of 290 clones were genotyped and phenotyped for fresh root yield (FRY), dry matter content (DMC), dry yield (DY), fresh shoot yield (FSY) and harvest index (HI). The clones were evaluated in clonal evaluation trials (CET), preliminary yield trials (PYT), advanced yield trials (AYT) and uniform yield trials (UYT), from 2013 to 2018 in ten locations. The breeding stages were analyzed as follows: one stage (CET), two stages (CET and PYT), three stages (CET, PYT and AYT) and four stages (CET, PYT, AYT and UYT). The genomic predictions were analyzed via k-fold cross-validation based on the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) considering a model with genetic additive effects and genotype × location interactions. Genomic and pedigree accuracies were moderate to high (0.56-0.72 and 0.62-0.78, respectively) for important starch-related traits such as DY and FRY; when considering one breeding stage (CET) with the aim of early selection, the genomic accuracies ranged from 0.60 (DMC) to 0.71 (HI). Moreover, the correlations between the genomic estimation breeding values of one-stage genomic analysis and the estimated breeding values of the four-stage (full data set) pedigree analysis were high for all traits as well as for a selection index including all traits. The results indicate great possibilities for genomic selection in cassava, especially for selection early in the breeding cycle (saving time and effort).

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticAgricultureBreedingCrosses, GeneticEconomicsGenomicsGenotypeInheritance PatternsManihotModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID31344109
PMCPMC6658084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.