Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344083›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Prevalence of tobacco use in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kapka Nilan, Tricia M McKeever, Ann McNeill, Martin Raw, Rachael L Murray

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of Lifestyle Health Promotion Interventions for Nurses: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mortality Risks of U.S. Healthcare Workers.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Smoking Among Healthcare Professionals in Australia: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kapka NilanUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4959-8125
Tricia M McKeeverUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Ann McNeillUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Martin RawNYU College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Rachael L MurrayUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GBKing's College London · GBNew York University · US

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate tobacco use prevalence in healthcare workers (HCW) by country income level, occupation and sex, and compare the estimates with the prevalence in the general population.

methodsWe systematically searched five databases; Medline, EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, CAB Abstracts, and LILACS for original studies published between 2000 and March 2016 without language restriction. All primary studies that reported tobacco use in any category of HCW were included. Study extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by three reviewers, using a standardised data extraction and quality appraisal form. We performed random effect meta-analyses to obtain prevalence estimates by World Bank (WB) country income level, sex, and occupation. Data on prevalence of tobacco use in the general population were obtained from the World Health Organisation (WHO) Global Health Observatory website. The review protocol registration number on PROSPERO is CRD42016041231.

results229 studies met our inclusion criteria, representing 457,415 HCW and 63 countries: 29 high-income countries (HIC), 21 upper-middle-income countries (UMIC), and 13 lower-middle-and-low-income countries (LMLIC). The overall pooled prevalence of tobacco use in HCW was 21%, 31% in males and 17% in females. Highest estimates were in male doctors in UMIC and LMLIC, 35% and 45%, and female nurses in HIC and UMIC, 21% and 25%. Heterogeneity was high (I2 > 90%). Country level comparison suggest that in HIC male HCW tend to have lower prevalence compared with males in the general population while in females the estimates were similar. Male and female HCW in UMIC and LMLIC tend to have similar or higher prevalence rates relative to their counterparts in the general population.

conclusionsHCW continue to use tobacco at high rates. Tackling HCW tobacco use requires urgent action as they are at the front line for tackling tobacco use in their patients.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIncomeMalePrevalenceSmokingTobacco ProductsTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID31344083
PMCPMC6657871
OpenAlexW2964206076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.