Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344079›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and standardized academic tests: Reliability across respondent type and age.

Maria Keilow, Hans Henrik Sievertsen, Janni Niclasen, Carsten Obel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Consumption of Sweets and Academic Performance among Mongolian Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria KeilowVIVE-The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4540-8838
Hans Henrik SievertsenVIVE-The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0126-828X
Janni NiclasenFrederikshøj skole og dagbehandling, Primulavej 2, DK-2720 Vanløse and Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Health Promotion, Diabetes Prevention Research, Gentofte, Denmark.
Carsten ObelDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploiting nation-wide data from the Danish National Birth Cohort, we show that children's emotional and behavioral problems measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) are closely related to their performance in standardized academic tests for reading and mathematics in sixth grade. The relationship is remarkably linear across the entire distribution for both the total difficulties score and subscale scores of the SDQ; higher scores on the SDQ (more problems) are related to worse performance in academic tests. We assess the similarity across respondent type; parent (child age 7 and 11), teacher (child age 11) and self-reported scores (child age 11), and find that teacher and parent reported scores have very similar slopes in the SDQ-test score relationship, while the child reported SDQ in relation to the academic test performance has a flatter slope.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesAge FactorsChildCohort StudiesDenmarkEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansInfantMaleMathematicsPsychology, ChildReadingReference StandardsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID31344079
PMCPMC6657876
OpenAlexW2963662641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.