ArticlePloS one2019
Reward sensitivity and electrodermal responses to actions and outcomes in a go/no-go task.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypes associated with problematic online gaming and gambling: A clustering approach among young adults.Addictive behaviors reports · 2026Article
- The Association Between Doctor-Patient Conflict and Uncertainty Stress During Clinical Internships Among Medical Students: A Panel Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sex differences in externalizing and internalizing traits and ventral striatal responses to monetary loss.Journal of psychiatric research · 2023Article
- The importance of a multidimensional approach to the preclinical study of major depressive disorder and apathy.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2022Article
- Loss and Frontal Striatal Reactivities Characterize Alcohol Use Severity and Rule-Breaking Behavior in Young Adult Drinkers.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2022Article
- Gray matter volumetric correlates of attention deficit and hyperactivity traits in emerging adolescents.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Gray matter volumetric correlates of dimensional impulsivity traits in children: Sex differences and heritability.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Attentional and Behavioral Disengagement as Coping Responses to Technostress and Financial Stress: An Experiment Based on Psychophysiological, Perceptual, and Behavioral Data.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Sex differences in attention deficit hyperactivity symptom severity and functional connectivity of the dorsal striatum in young adults.Neuroimage. Reports · 2021Article
- Sex differences in neural responses to reward and the influences of individual reward and punishment sensitivity.BMC neuroscience · 2021Article
- Problem drinking alters gray matter volume and food cue responses of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex.Addiction biology · 2021Article
- Exploring the Embodiment of a Virtual Hand in a Spatially Augmented Respiratory Biofeedback Setting.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- Neural Responses to Reward in a Gambling Task: Sex Differences and Individual Variation in Reward-Driven Impulsivity.Cerebral cortex communications · 2020Article
- Sex Differences in Neural Responses to the Perception of Social Interactions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin conductance response (SCR) is used in psychophysiological research to measure the reactions of the autonomic nervous system to reward and punishment. While there is consistent evidence that SCR increases to both aversive and appetitive stimuli, it remains unclear whether SCR simply represents a general index of arousal to motivationally significant outcomes or may also differentiate action or inhibition of action that lead to such outcomes. Furthermore, individual differences in trait sensitivity to reward and punishment can influence physiological arousal during approach and avoidance behaviors. Yet, their inter-relationships have not been examined. To address these gaps, we employed a reward go/no-go task with ⅔ go and ⅓ no-go trials and an individually titrated go response window. Correct go and no-go responses were rewarded while incorrect responses were penalized. We examined whether SCR varied with outcome (win vs. loss), action (go vs. no-go), and individual differences in reward sensitivity (SR) and sex. The results showed greater SCRs to loss vs. win, to go vs. no-go success, and to go success in positive correlation with SR. Further, SCR mediated the relationship between SR and go success rate. In sex differences, men exhibited greater SCR which was more predictive of go success rate relative to women. In contrast, SCR was more predictive of no-go success rate in women. Thus, SCR varies according to behavioral contingency, outcome, sex, and reward sensitivity. These findings add to the literature by characterizing the individual and behavioral factors that may influence physiological arousal in response to salient events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.