Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31344025›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

RPW8/HR repeats control NLR activation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Cristina A Barragan, Rui Wu, Sang-Tae Kim, Wanyan Xi, Anette Habring, Jörg Hagmann, Anna-Lena Van de Weyer, Maricris Zaidem, William Wing Ho Ho, George Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genome-Wide Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phenotypic characterization and gene mapping of hybrid necrosis in Triticum durum-Haynaldia villosa amphiploids.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristina A BarraganDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Rui WuDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2348-8059
Sang-Tae KimDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1645-6021
Wanyan XiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Anette HabringDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Jörg HagmannDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-3103
Anna-Lena Van de WeyerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Maricris ZaidemDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1913-6771
William Wing Ho HoDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7360-2243
George WangDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5214-9382
Ilja BezrukovDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2114-7963
Eunyoung ChaeDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-9837
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DENational University of Singapore · SGThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many plant species, conflicts between divergent elements of the immune system, especially nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLR), can lead to hybrid necrosis. Here, we report deleterious allele-specific interactions between an NLR and a non-NLR gene cluster, resulting in not one, but multiple hybrid necrosis cases in Arabidopsis thaliana. The NLR cluster is RESISTANCE TO PERONOSPORA PARASITICA 7 (RPP7), which can confer strain-specific resistance to oomycetes. The non-NLR cluster is RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW 8 (RPW8) / HOMOLOG OF RPW8 (HR), which can confer broad-spectrum resistance to both fungi and oomycetes. RPW8/HR proteins contain at the N-terminus a potential transmembrane domain, followed by a specific coiled-coil (CC) domain that is similar to a domain found in pore-forming toxins MLKL and HET-S from mammals and fungi. C-terminal to the CC domain is a variable number of 21- or 14-amino acid repeats, reminiscent of regulatory 21-amino acid repeats in fungal HET-S. The number of repeats in different RPW8/HR proteins along with the sequence of a short C-terminal tail predicts their ability to activate immunity in combination with specific RPP7 partners. Whether a larger or smaller number of repeats is more dangerous depends on the specific RPW8/HR autoimmune risk variant.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsAscomycotaDisease ResistanceImmunity, InnatePlant DiseasesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidArabidopsis ProteinsRPP7 protein, ArabidopsisRPW8.1 protein, Arabidopsis

Identifiers

PMID31344025
PMCPMC6684095
OpenAlexW2963302568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.