Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31343669›Full record

ArticleJAMA2019

Realizing Shared Decision-making in Practice.

Mary Catherine Beach, Jeremy Sugarman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Surrogate Wars: The "Best Interest Values" Hierarchy & End-of-Life Conflicts with Surrogate Decision-Makers.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Explainable artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: an overview.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Anesthesia and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: proceed with caution!Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Navigating ethical challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials on COVID-19.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary Catherine BeachBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jeremy SugarmanBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Communication Quality and Patient Outcomes in HIV/AIDS and Substance AbuseK24DA037804 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEACH, MARY CATHERINE · 2015 to 2019
$923k
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA037804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID31343669
PMCPMC8786261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.