Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31343659›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2020

Impact of Neurapheresis System on Intrathecal Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.

Mohammadreza Khani, Lucas R Sass, Aaron R McCabe, Laura M Zitella Verbick, Shivanand P Lad, M Keith Sharp, Bryn A Martin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammadreza KhaniDepartment of Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844.
Lucas R SassDepartment of Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844.
Aaron R McCabeMinnetronix Neuro, Inc., St. Paul, MN 55108.
Laura M Zitella VerbickMinnetronix Neuro, Inc., St. Paul, MN 55108.
Shivanand P LadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710.
M Keith SharpDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292.
Bryn A MartinDepartment of Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844.
University of Idaho · USMinnetronix (United States) · USDuke University · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Scott A Minnich · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
Tracking and EvaluationU54GM104944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI WARD, TONY JOHN · 2013 to 2023
$39.6M
Highly Accelerated Simultaneous Multi-Slice Phase Contrast MRIR44MH112210 · NIMH · ADVANCED MRI TECHNOLOGY, LLC · PI FEINBERG, DAVID ALAN · 2016 to 2017
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104944NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH112210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that early and rapid filtration of blood from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in postsubarachnoid hemorrhage patients may reduce hospital stay and related adverse events. In this study, we formulated a subject-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to parametrically investigate the impact of a novel dual-lumen catheter-based CSF filtration system, the Neurapheresis™ system (Minnetronix Neuro, Inc., St. Paul, MN), on intrathecal CSF dynamics. The operating principle of this system is to remove CSF from one location along the spine (aspiration port), externally filter the CSF routing the retentate to a waste bag, and return permeate (uncontaminated CSF) to another location along the spine (return port). The CFD model allowed parametric simulation of how the Neurapheresis system impacts intrathecal CSF velocities and steady-steady streaming under various Neurapheresis flow settings ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 ml/min and with a constant retentate removal rate of 0.2 ml/min simulation of the Neurapheresis system were compared to a lumbar drain simulation with a typical CSF removal rate setting of 0.2 ml/min. Results showed that the Neurapheresis system at a maximum flow of 2.0 ml/min increased average steady streaming CSF velocity 2× in comparison to lumbar drain (0.190 ± 0.133 versus 0.093 ± 0.107 mm/s, respectively). This affect was localized to the region within the Neurapheresis flow loop. The mean velocities introduced by the flow loop were relatively small in comparison to normal cardiac-induced CSF velocities.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidHydrodynamicsComputer SimulationFiltrationHumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID31343659
PMCPMC7104775
OpenAlexW2963192972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.