Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31343419›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychiatry2019

Disordered eating after bariatric surgery: clinical aspects, impact on outcomes, and intervention strategies.

Eva M Conceição, Andrea Goldschmidt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loss of control as a transdiagnostic feature in obesity-related eating behaviours: A systematic review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Marginal ulcers and associated risk factors after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The utility of DSM-5 indicators of loss of control eating for the bariatric surgery population.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva M ConceiçãoSchool of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Andrea GoldschmidtDepartment of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Brown University · USUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

Neurodevelopmental substrates of emotion regulation in obese, binge eating youthK23DK105234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GOLDSCHMIDT, ANDREA BETH · 2015 to 2018
$673k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK105234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDisordered eating behaviors (DEBs) are associated with poor weight outcomes following bariatric surgery. We describe DEBs most relevant to this population, their associations with weight outcomes, and emerging data on interventions for DEBs. RECENT

findingsLoss of control eating episodes and grazing have been the most well studied DEBs in bariatric samples. Although DEBs often remit after surgery even without targeted intervention, a subgroup of patients have persistent or newly developed DEBs postoperatively. Preoperative DEBs have little effect on weight outcomes, whereas preoperative impulse control-related features commonly associated with DEBs (e.g., inhibitory control) may have stronger predictive value. Postoperatively, DEBs appear to exert robust effects on concurrently measured weight. Postoperative interventions hold promise for optimizing treatment outcomes. SUMMARY: We recommend the following to improve clinical care and move research forward: a common language for DEB constructs is needed to improve cross-talk among researchers and care providers; diagnostic schemes and assessment tools may require tailoring for the bariatric population; mechanisms underlying improvements in DEBs following surgery should be clarified; ongoing monitoring of DEBs in the postoperative period is warranted; and a stepped-care approach may improve weight outcomes in a cost-effective manner.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMaleObesity, MorbidWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID31343419
PMCPMC6768715
OpenAlexW2965259930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.