ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019
A Real-Time Automated Patient Screening System for Clinical Trials Eligibility in an Emergency Department: Design and Evaluation.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Live Primary Prostate Cancer Cell Research in Veterans.Cancer research communications · 2026Pooled it
- Pediatric Predictive Artificial Intelligence Implemented in Clinical Practice from 2010 to 2021: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Utilization of EHRs for clinical trials: a systematic review.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- TrialTriage, a Semiautonomous Prescreening Workflow for Resolving Ambiguity in Phase I Oncology Trial Eligibility: Development and Proof-of-Concept Study Using Synthetic Cases.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical trial participant recruitment and retention: A scoping review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- A Multi-Model LLM Consensus Framework to Identify EHR-Predictable Eligibility Criteria in NSCLC Immunotherapy Trials.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- An Intelligent Trial Eligibility Screening Tool Using Natural Language Processing With a Block-Based Visual Programming Interface: Development and Usability Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- AI-augmented frameworks for enhancing Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: A memory clinic perspective.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Large Language Models for Automating Clinical Trial Criteria Conversion to Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model Queries: Validation and Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Development and implementation of cancer clinical trial patient screening using an electronic medical record-integrated trial matching system.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Natural Language Processing in Support of Evidence-based Medicine: A Scoping Review.Findings of ACL. ACL · 2025Article
- Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- "The Truth Is, We Must Miss Some": A Qualitative Study of the Patient Eligibility Screening Process, and Automation Perspectives, for Cancer Clinical Trials.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- User Requirements for an Electronic Patient Recruitment System: Semistructured Interview Analysis After First Implementation in 3 German University Hospitals.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Eligibility Criteria Relevance for the Purpose of IT-Supported Trial Recruitment: Descriptive Quantitative Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Exploring implementation outcomes in the clinical trial context: a qualitative study of physician trial stakeholders.Trials · 2023Article
- Piloting an automated clinical trial eligibility surveillance and provider alert system based on artificial intelligence and standard data models.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Observational
- Clinical research staff perceptions on a natural language processing-driven tool for eligibility prescreening: An iterative usability assessment.International journal of medical informatics · 2023Article
- The future of automated infection detection: Innovation to transform practice (Part III/III).Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne critical hurdle for clinical trial recruitment is the lack of an efficient method for identifying subjects who meet the eligibility criteria. Given the large volume of data documented in electronic health records (EHRs), it is labor-intensive for the staff to screen relevant information, particularly within the time frame needed. To facilitate subject identification, we developed a natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning-based system, Automated Clinical Trial Eligibility Screener (ACTES), which analyzes structured data and unstructured narratives automatically to determine patients' suitability for clinical trial enrollment. In this study, we integrated the ACTES into clinical practice to support real-time patient screening.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate ACTES's impact on the institutional workflow, prospectively and comprehensively. We hypothesized that compared with the manual screening process, using EHR-based automated screening would improve efficiency of patient identification, streamline patient recruitment workflow, and increase enrollment in clinical trials.
methodsThe ACTES was fully integrated into the clinical research coordinators' (CRC) workflow in the pediatric emergency department (ED) at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. The system continuously analyzed EHR information for current ED patients and recommended potential candidates for clinical trials. Relevant patient eligibility information was presented in real time on a dashboard available to CRCs to facilitate their recruitment. To assess the system's effectiveness, we performed a multidimensional, prospective evaluation for a 12-month period, including a time-and-motion study, quantitative assessments of enrollment, and postevaluation usability surveys collected from the CRCs.
resultsCompared with manual screening, the use of ACTES reduced the patient screening time by 34% (P<.001). The saved time was redirected to other activities such as study-related administrative tasks (P=.03) and work-related conversations (P=.006) that streamlined teamwork among the CRCs. The quantitative assessments showed that automated screening improved the numbers of subjects screened, approached, and enrolled by 14.7%, 11.1%, and 11.1%, respectively, suggesting the potential of ACTES in streamlining recruitment workflow. Finally, the ACTES achieved a system usability scale of 80.0 in the postevaluation surveys, suggesting that it was a good computerized solution.
conclusionsBy leveraging NLP and machine learning technologies, the ACTES demonstrated good capacity for improving efficiency of patient identification. The quantitative assessments demonstrated the potential of ACTES in streamlining recruitment workflow and improving patient enrollment. The postevaluation surveys suggested that the system was a good computerized solution with satisfactory usability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.